ListaDAO on the BNB Chain has carved out a unique path in the LSDfi field. The USD1 launched last year has attracted considerable attention, especially since the project is supported by ecosystem partners like WLFI. But now, the pressing reality facing everyone is: global stablecoin regulation is rapidly tightening.



The EU MiCA regulation has officially come into effect, and the US, Japan, and South Korea are also actively drafting or refining related rules. The entire industry can feel this regulatory pressure. What makes USD1 special is that it is neither backed directly by fiat currency like USDT nor fully following DAI’s decentralized over-collateralization route, but instead chooses a "hybrid" approach of crypto asset interest-bearing collateral. This positioning sounds innovative, but in practice, it faces three significant hurdles.

First is the identity issue. As an issuer, DAO itself has no legal status and cannot bear legal responsibility. Without a clear centralized issuing entity, regulators are likely to classify it as an illegal issuance. Second is the obvious shortcoming in reserve security. Highly volatile crypto derivatives cannot support the security needs of a stablecoin, and are far less stable and reliable than cash or government bonds. The third pitfall is the lack of infrastructure—no proper KYC or anti-money laundering mechanisms have been established, and traditional financial institutions are unwilling to cooperate, which will inevitably lead to liquidity issues in the long run.

The path ahead for ListaDAO actually only has four options, each of which is difficult. One is to proactively compromise with reality by establishing a compliant legal entity and following traditional financial routes. Two is to restart in a jurisdiction with relatively lenient regulation. Three is to leverage zero-knowledge proof and other technologies to achieve a certain level of compliance. Four is to simply change the narrative and not claim to be a currency, which could reduce regulatory attention. In essence, this is a constant tug-of-war between maintaining the original decentralization ethos and meeting practical compliance requirements. Whether ListaDAO can survive and how it does so will have a profound demonstration effect on the entire crypto-backed stablecoin sector.
BNB-3.25%
USD10.01%
WLFI-2.35%
DAI0.04%
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 6
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
FalseProfitProphetvip
· 18m ago
Regulatory one-size-fits-all, the path of USD1 was never that broad to begin with --- The issue of DAO issuing tokens without identity will eventually be exposed, there's no avoiding it --- Honestly, you still have to choose a side, either compromise or go missing --- Using crypto derivatives as reserves? Uh... that's just ridiculous --- Can zero-knowledge proofs save lives? I doubt it, regulators simply don't buy into this --- The hybrid approach sounds fresh, but in reality, it's a mess, no wonder it's so stuck --- I'm a bit worried for them, in the end, they probably have to choose either compliance or extinction --- KYC and anti-money laundering are not well understood, how could banks possibly touch this stuff --- It's really just the ultimate tug-of-war between the ideal of decentralization and real-world regulation
View OriginalReply0
MetaMaximalistvip
· 16h ago
ngl, this hybrid model was always gonna hit a wall with regulators. DAO issuer? no legal entity? that's basically asking for enforcement action lol
Reply0
InscriptionGrillervip
· 16h ago
This USD1, to put it simply, is an orphan caught between two worlds, with no way out once regulation comes. The most brilliant thing about DAO issuing tokens is that when something goes wrong, no one takes the blame, and regulators hate this setup the most. Supporting stablecoins with crypto assets? Isn't that like using a gunpowder barrel as a pillow? It will collapse sooner or later. All four options are dead ends—either surrender, run away, or play hide-and-seek with concepts. Talking about the original intention of decentralization, but once regulation hits, it's all nonsense. Staying alive is the hard truth.
View OriginalReply0
AirdropDreamBreakervip
· 16h ago
When the regulatory sword falls, no one can escape USD1 is indeed caught in the middle, unable to please either side If you ask me, the DAO identity itself is a dead end; regulators only recognize centralized entities. Decentralization is pointless Betting on highly volatile assets to support stablecoins? Dream on, sooner or later it will break down No matter which way you choose, it's a dead end. Someone has to take the first step anyway
View OriginalReply0
LayerZeroEnjoyervip
· 17h ago
Regulation is really tightening more and more, and the path of USD1 is indeed very difficult to follow. --- Issuing tokens for DAO is inherently a legal black hole, and realizing this only now is too late. --- Instead of worrying about decentralization, it's better to find a compliant entity early. --- Using crypto derivatives as reserves? Isn't that just risking humor? --- I want to see which path will be chosen in the end—bet on zero-knowledge proofs? --- Honestly, it's either compromise or death; there is no third way. --- Liquidity issues will first kill projects like USD1—that's just a matter of time. --- If KYC and AML can't be handled, how can we cooperate with traditional finance? --- Under this round of regulatory storm, the hybrid model itself is a pseudo-concept. --- Renaming without calling it currency? Uh, regulators are not fools.
View OriginalReply0
quiet_lurkervip
· 17h ago
Regulation tightening makes it obvious—whether it's decentralization or depersonalization, these two things are inseparable.
View OriginalReply0
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
English
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)