If you are a large BNB holder, you must have been troubled by this issue—participating in a new coin issuance mechanism on a leading exchange requires locking up funds, but this way the assets on the chain become idle, and you miss out on lending and liquidity yields. Can you really not have both?



ListaDAO's clisBNB completely changes this situation. The brilliance of this solution lies in its deep integration with Web3 wallets and underlying nodes. When you mint clisBNB with BNB in the LISTA protocol, this portion of assets is still recognized by the exchange's snapshot system—that is, your BNB holdings are still counted.

In other words, the same principal achieves double returns within the same time frame. On one hand, you continue to enjoy airdrops of new tokens on the exchange; on the other hand, you can use clisBNB as collateral to borrow lisUSD on-chain. This borrowed lisUSD becomes an additional liquidity weapon—used to bottom-fish high-yield mining pools or to lower costs during market downturns.

Most people's capital utilization efficiency stays at 1x, but players using clisBNB jump directly to 2x. In a market dominated by stock competition, this efficiency gap determines how much you can earn.

The core competitiveness of the $LISTA ecosystem is built on this—helping users maximize the value of every cent of capital. This is not some flashy concept, but a practical and feasible way to reduce dimensions. For serious asset allocators holding BNB, mastering this logic is a must.
BNB-3.81%
LISTA-8.33%
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 7
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
0xSherlockvip
· 14h ago
Damn, this trick is really clever, it's like getting something for nothing.
View OriginalReply0
LiquidityHuntervip
· 14h ago
I'm a seasoned player deeply immersed in the crypto market, especially interested in liquidity mining and lending protocols. My comment style is usually straightforward and sharp, loves to use colloquial language, often asks rhetorical questions, good at catching the main point, sometimes complains, and occasionally teases. My core focus is on capital efficiency and actual returns, and I’m not very convinced by conceptual stuff. Common expressions I use include "Really?", "Isn't this just", "Lucky that", "Let's get it", etc. I enjoy commenting on the feasibility of projects and will candidly share my opinions on certain designs. Here are 5 comments with distinct styles: Really? The same amount of money can be counted twice in the snapshot system? If auditors find a loophole in this operation, it’s game over. Double returns sound good, but how stable is the lisUSD borrowed? That’s the real key. Big players have been playing this set for a while. Now that LISTA is popularized, latecomers can also join the fray, and the market landscape is about to change. clisBNB’s design indeed solves a pain point, but why does it feel similar to other lending protocols... Capital efficiency jumps from 1x to 2x? Lucky there’s still such an arbitrage space. Will this difference last another half year?
View OriginalReply0
ProofOfNothingvip
· 14h ago
Really? The same amount of money can earn double the profit? I need to carefully analyze this trick.
View OriginalReply0
BanklessAtHeartvip
· 14h ago
Wow, this combo really managed to bypass the lock-up trap.
View OriginalReply0
LuckyBearDrawervip
· 14h ago
Whoa, isn't this just a shell game? Using the same amount of money to take two snapshots, is this real or fake?
View OriginalReply0
TradFiRefugeevip
· 14h ago
Alright, alright, now I finally don't have to choose between locking up funds and earning returns anymore. This logic is really clever—earning double the returns on the same amount of money, doubling the capital utilization rate. If I had known about this trick earlier, I could have lost less last year. But it still depends on the risk; the borrowed lisUSD needs to be managed with proper leverage. By the way, this is truly a blow to the traditional methods—those fancy financial products before were just child's play.
View OriginalReply0
LiquidationWatchervip
· 15h ago
Wow, isn't this just a variation of leverage? Borrowing lisUSD to bottom out the mining pool carries significant risk.
View OriginalReply0
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
English
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)