Regarding Dan's attention to Finn, I have a few opinions:

1. If Dan is only taking short-term profits, then he is very likely to be drained in the short term.

2. If Dan only wants to receive and does not want to take any responsibility, then the 1 on BSC is very likely to experience a retaliatory surge, ultimately resetting emotions and liquidity through a fix to zero. (I've seen too many of these operations in bags)

3. If Dan has received and chooses to actively participate in building this ticker, then it will depend on subsequent execution and how the market evaluates it. Time will provide the answer.

Personally,
The narrative of point 1 doesn't actually need to rely heavily on the author himself.

The real established narrative now is the core of the article + the layered double entendre of "1" itself as a buff,
rather than something attributed to a single person.

The author can be a catalyst,
but once the narrative takes shape,
it shouldn't belong solely to the author.