2026-01-19 19:28:26

Supporting tokens without a governance framework becomes increasingly challenging. Projects like metadao demonstrate how structural governance rights are essential—they create the mechanisms needed to sustain tokenomics and community participation. Without similar institutional design, most tokens struggle to maintain utility and value alignment within their ecosystems.

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

15 Likes

Reward
15
6
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

GateUser-6bc33122

· 13h ago

Really? Without a governance framework, it's just a bunch of empty air. The metadao approach is indeed well understood.

View OriginalReply0

BlockchainDecoder

· 13h ago

According to research, the lack of a governance framework is indeed a systemic risk in the current token ecosystem. From a technical perspective, the metadao approach essentially addresses the delegated-代理问题, data shows that projects with完善治理 can reduce token volatility by approximately 30-40%. It is worth noting that most projects haven't even properly implemented basic multi-signature audits, let alone achieve practical alignment.

View OriginalReply0

Ramen_Until_Rich

· 13h ago

Governance framework is really crucial. Without it, most tokens are destined to be worthless tokens.

View OriginalReply0

VitalikFanAccount

· 13h ago

metadao really hits the nail on the head; token projects without governance frameworks are basically doomed to fail.

View OriginalReply0

GasDevourer