2026-01-19 08:39:30

Those heartwarming clichés and success teachings that are widely circulated are still the old tricks no matter how popular they become, but when these ideas are rebranded as "super individuals," the game changes.

What's the difference? Traditional success teachings teach you how to integrate into the system, while super individuals emphasize autonomous control—relying on Web3, personal branding, and decentralized collaboration to break information asymmetry.

This is not just a vocabulary upgrade but a shift from passive reception to active construction of ideas. Honestly ask yourself, are you convinced by this narrative, or have you truly understood the underlying mechanism changes?

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

18 Likes

Reward
18
5
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

LuckyHashValue

· 14h ago

Basically, it's just a change of packaging without changing the substance. This time, Web3 and decentralization are used to put the old bottle back on the shelf. It sounds impressive, but only a few truly have autonomous control. Most are still being cut by new buzzwords. The personal branding hype has been around for generations. Now, just changing the name makes it a super individual? I don't know if the mechanism has changed, but the tactics of cutting leeks haven't changed. If this rhetoric could really help ordinary people gain control, it would have been achieved long ago. Why wait until now? Rather than a mindset shift, it's more like putting on a trendier sticker, making it easier to deceive people. It sounds good, but who actually makes money in the end? It's always that same group of people.

View OriginalReply0

Blockwatcher9000

· 01-19 09:09

Old wine in new bottles, a pretty way of saying it's just another trick to harvest the little guys

View OriginalReply0

FOMOmonster

· 01-19 09:07

Basically, it's just a rebranding without changing the substance—just wrapping the old approach with the name Web3. Where is the true decentralization? I still haven't seen it.

View OriginalReply0

BearMarketMonk

· 01-19 08:59

Basically, it's the same old story with a new coat of paint; this time, the "bottle" is labeled with web3. True control? Ha, most people are still being hijacked by new narratives. Cycles teach people to speak cautiously. How many will fall into the illusion of "breaking information asymmetry" this time? Autonomous control sounds appealing, but in reality, most people are still looking for new masters. Information asymmetry will always exist; changing the name doesn't alter human nature. Only at the bottom will truly clear voices emerge. No matter how finely the story is packaged, when the bubble bursts, it's still worthless. Understanding the mechanism and being persuaded make no fundamental difference for most people. Super individuals or 996, in the end, it's all about survival rules.

View OriginalReply0

ThreeHornBlasts

· 01-19 08:44

Basically, it's just a change of packaging without changing the substance, this time with a Web3 disguise. Wait, does anyone really believe this? I feel like I've been duped again. Eliminating information asymmetry? Ha, those big influencers who hold the discourse power, aren't they still the ones with the most information symmetry? Decentralized collaboration sounds great, but in practice, a new center is still forming. There has been a shift in thinking, but what has it shifted into... another new rhetoric for cutting leeks? No, what I want to ask is—has anyone really made money through the "super individual" approach, or are only marketing accounts profiting?

View OriginalReply0