2026-01-19 08:27:25

Tesla's chip architecture operates across two distinct programs working in parallel. The Dojo platform handles the heavy lifting on the training side, processing massive datasets to develop AI models. Meanwhile, the AI4 and AI5 chip lines focus specifically on inference tasks within vehicles—the real-world application layer.

Right now, AI4 is the current generation powering Tesla's fleet. It's battle-tested, optimized, and doing the job. But AI5? That's where things get interesting. The new chip is in final stages and represents a fundamental generational jump.

Here's the kicker: by certain performance metrics, AI5 delivers roughly 40× the capability of AI4. Not 40 percent—we're talking a 40-fold improvement. That's not just an incremental upgrade; it's the kind of leap that changes what's possible in autonomous decision-making and real-time processing.

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

11 Likes

Reward
11
6
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

DaisyUnicorn

· 23h ago

40x? That would be quite a feat. If AI5 really can be this powerful, autonomous driving would take off directly... But speaking of which, the stuff trained by Dojo landing in cars is a bit like an oracle in DeFi. The more intermediate steps there are, the greater the risk.

View OriginalReply0

SelfMadeRuggee

· 01-19 08:52

40x? If that's true, autonomous driving would take off directly. --- AI5 is out, and it feels like AI4 is depreciating... But the Dojo side is also worth watching. --- Wait, what does 40x mean? Can it really jump that much in chip design? --- Here they go again, making promises. I just want to see real car data speak. --- Dojo handles training, AI5 is for inference... This architecture design is actually quite clear, but who doesn't boast? --- Performance improves 40x, but what about the cost? It must be ridiculously expensive, that's the real trap. --- Actual road tests are the real measure; paper specs are all虚假的. --- Bro, I don't believe this 40x. If it were really like that, mass production would have started long ago. --- Let's see how the car turns out when it comes out. It's too early to say anything now.

View OriginalReply0

GasFeeNightmare

· 01-19 08:49

40x performance improvement? That's a bit of an exaggeration... Let's see if it can really run stably first.

View OriginalReply0

PanicSeller

· 01-19 08:41

40x? If that's true, you should jump on it immediately. AI5 is almost catching up to human reaction speed.

View OriginalReply0

WhaleStalker

· 01-19 08:36

40x performance improvement? If this really gets implemented, autonomous driving will be completely transformed... But will the production capacity keep up?

View OriginalReply0

OnChain_Detective

· 01-19 08:30

hold up, 40x jump sounds wild but let me flag something here—*where's* the actual benchmark data? pattern analysis suggests these claims need serious scrutiny. not saying musk's lying but... suspicious activity detected when specs get that dramatic without full methodology disclosed, ngl. dyor folks, always verify the underlying metrics before moon-posting 🚩

Reply0