Polymarket Faces Trust Crisis: Where Is the Boundary of Decision-Making Power in Prediction Markets?

【Blockchain Rhythm】 Recently, the prediction market platform Polymarket has triggered collective dissatisfaction among users due to a controversial market ruling.

The incident originated from Polymarket’s negative conclusion on a prediction market about “whether the U.S. will invade Venezuela before December 31st,” which had a trading volume of $2.76 million. However, once this decision was announced, the Polymarket user community exploded.

Users on the platform questioned it one after another, with some asking, “What exactly counts as an invasion?” Others directly criticized Polymarket as “Polyscam.” More intense comments appeared, with a user stating, “Polymarket has become a complete arbitrary ruling machine. The definitions of terms can be changed at will, deviating from any recognized meaning, and facts are ignored. A military operation, the arrest of a national leader, or a takeover of a country—none of these count as an invasion. This is a joke.”

Someone asked an even more heartbreaking question: “So it doesn’t count as an invasion just because the operation was quick and there were few casualties?” (According to reports, about 80 people were killed in this operation.)

Polymarket later issued an explanation on its official website: “The market definition refers to U.S. military actions aimed at establishing control. When Trump mentioned negotiations with the Venezuelan government, he said the U.S. would ‘take over’ Venezuela, but this statement alone is not enough to classify the arrest operation as an invasion.”

However, this explanation did not calm the users’ anger. The core question from users was: If military actions and power takeovers don’t count as invasions, what standards does Polymarket use to define “invasion”? The ambiguity of such rulings has led people to worry—can prediction markets truly establish fair and transparent rules?

MarketWatch attempted to seek a deeper explanation from Polymarket and its 28-year-old founder, Shayne Coplan, but received no response.

This incident exposes a core issue faced by Web3 prediction markets: when platforms need to rule on ambiguous historical events, how can they ensure transparency and consistency in rules? On what basis is user trust built? This is not only about Polymarket’s future but also about the healthy development of the entire prediction market ecosystem.

View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 5
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
SatsStackingvip
· 01-07 04:32
Bro, this is just outrageous. Saying no to 2.76 million USD with a veto, changing rules at will? What kind of game is this? --- The power of definition is in the hands of Polymarket... Isn't this just the traditional intermediary model? I thought going on-chain could change something. --- Wait, what does "invasion" mean? Poly hasn't even figured it out? How are we supposed to bet then... --- Really, who dares to trust this kind of arbitration mechanism? Next time, they might even change the definitions of "yes" and "no." --- Polyscam is not just a name; this time, it directly wrecked the prediction market model. Participants are so wronged. --- Honestly, this shouldn't be defined by a centralized team at all. Isn't the core competitiveness of prediction markets just gone like that?
View OriginalReply0
LiquiditySurfervip
· 01-07 04:28
This standard of judgment all depends on mood... A market worth 2.76 million dollars is decided on a whim, no matter how deep the liquidity is, it's useless. The platform holding the power to define terms is the biggest market-making risk, even more deadly than slippage.
View OriginalReply0
BlockchainArchaeologistvip
· 01-07 04:25
Another one? The judgment standard of Polymarket is really outrageous, just casually labeling it as 2.76 million USD. Who gave them that authority? --- Basically, it's still human factors. What does it mean to decide who invades... These platforms essentially haven't solved the trust issue. --- Wait, can the terminology definitions be changed arbitrarily? Then the previous orders might all be at risk. I need to check my positions. --- Polyscam is really becoming more and more well-deserved. How can a decentralized prediction market be judged in the most centralized way? --- Laughs. People warned about this back when Bitcoin was just starting. On-chain data can't save subjective markets. --- It feels like every platform wants to learn from Uniswap but only learns operational aspects. Governance is just a show. --- 2.76 million was just decided like that. If it were my money, I would have already mobilized influencers.
View OriginalReply0
CryptoPhoenixvip
· 01-07 04:19
Another day of trust being betrayed, 2.76 million USD just arbitrarily decided. This is why I say prediction markets are always in the dilemma of the secondary market [laughing] Can vocabulary definitions be arbitrarily changed? Then I can also arbitrarily define what "compliance" means. Logic really is conservation of energy. Before rebirth, you have to go through moments when confidence is shattered, but the question is... who will compensate that 2.76 million? Polymarket really reminds me of those exchanges that ran away in 2018. History always repeats itself. Forget it, my understanding of the bottom range has become clearer again. Decentralized prediction markets still require us to control the risks ourselves.
View OriginalReply0
NftBankruptcyClubvip
· 01-07 04:12
Just took some action, centralized arbitration is like that—say you didn't breach, and you didn't breach; $2.76 million says it's not.
View OriginalReply0
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
English
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)