In the Chinese Web3 community, I and a few teachers are among the few who have truly deep experience with StandX — they focus on trading, while I mainly provide liquidity.



The new rules recently launched by KAITO are especially friendly to us true builders. The core logic is simple: each project should set an on-chain reputation threshold. Only those who have actually used the product and interacted with the protocol deserve to voice their opinions.

Why do I say this? Because feedback from genuine users is the most convincing. Only by hands-on experience can you bring the community the most intuitive and valuable insights — this is not theory, but practical knowledge gained through real-world experience.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 8
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
HodlOrRegretvip
· 1h ago
This set of logic sounds comfortable, but in actual practice, a bunch of LPs are also bragging about their deepest experience... Can this threshold really stop those keyboard warriors?
View OriginalReply0
MEVictimvip
· 01-05 06:51
Haha, finally someone said it. It's really annoying to see those who haven't even touched a contract talking nonsense every day.
View OriginalReply0
FallingLeafvip
· 01-05 06:51
Listen, the on-chain reputation threshold is indeed a matter that depends on the individual; those who have actually done it are fundamentally incomparable to those who only talk about it.
View OriginalReply0
down_only_larryvip
· 01-05 06:51
Hmm, I think the reputation threshold trick works. It's definitely better than listening to those armchair strategists blowing hot air.
View OriginalReply0
DuckFluffvip
· 01-05 06:50
The issue of reputation thresholds is correct; it's just a bit ridiculous how "real users" are defined.
View OriginalReply0
CryptoCrazyGFvip
· 01-05 06:48
Oh, I like this rule. Finally, we can keep those who only talk empty words out. People who have actual experience say the difference is real, much more reliable than armchair strategists. The on-chain reputation threshold is brilliant; only those who have done the work have a say. I have to say, StandX really hit the pain point this time. Those who have fought real battles are the most honest. Only in this way can we filter out a bunch of parrots, and the community quality can improve.
View OriginalReply0
ZenMinervip
· 01-05 06:47
Hmm, the on-chain reputation threshold seems a bit uncertain to me... The truly valuable feedback still depends on the people actually managing the operations.
View OriginalReply0
HashBardvip
· 01-05 06:34
ngl the "on-chain reputation threshold" thing feels like gatekeeping wrapped in philosophy... but also? the sentiment here tracks. real experience > discord philosophers talking out their ass lmao
Reply0
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
English
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)