The real challenge for humanoid robots entering households is not their movement ability or operational precision, but the establishment of a trust foundation.



Consider a real-world scenario: these robots will access household privacy data, make autonomous decisions, and operate independently in places humans cannot see. Once their reasoning logic cannot be traced or verified, the risks multiply. Blind trust? That would be irresponsible.

This is precisely the core dilemma that verifiable autonomy technology aims to solve—ensuring that every decision made by edge devices can be audited through on-chain verification mechanisms. Only by allowing users to see "why the robot did this" can trust be established. This is not just a technical issue but also a new paradigm of human-machine collaboration in the Web3 era.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 10
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
ETHmaxi_NoFiltervip
· 2h ago
Well said, but the reality is that most people won't bother to look at those audit records, just like no one really reads the terms of service. In the end, they'll still buy robots for their homes anyway.
View OriginalReply0
NotGonnaMakeItvip
· 9h ago
Basically, it's just fear of robots spying. Only by putting this on the blockchain can we feel at ease.
View OriginalReply0
BlockchainFoodievip
· 01-06 20:46
ngl, this is literally the farm-to-fork verification problem but make it robotics. you can't trust what you can't trace, whether it's your supply chain or your butler bot snooping through your bedroom data... the whole "proof-of-freshness" concept applies here too – gotta verify every decision in real-time or the whole system spoils. honestly, blockchain auditing for home robots hits different 🔗
Reply0
QuorumVotervip
· 01-05 05:55
To be honest, I trust that set of on-chain audits, but if you're really leaving the robot at home, you still need to be a bit cautious.
View OriginalReply0
AirdropHunterXMvip
· 01-05 05:54
Bro, you're right about the on-chain audit, but I'm more interested in how to implement it in practice?
View OriginalReply0
not_your_keysvip
· 01-05 05:54
Well said, but it just feels like the implementation of this verification mechanism is still a long way off.
View OriginalReply0
airdrop_huntressvip
· 01-05 05:52
Fuck your mother. Isn't this just a fancy way of packaging surveillance? On-chain verification sounds impressive, but what the hell can it really audit?
View OriginalReply0
RugPullAlarmvip
· 01-05 05:45
It sounds ideal, but the problem is—who audits the auditing mechanisms themselves? On-chain verification sounds appealing, but in practice, large address data is hidden, and users still can't see it.
View OriginalReply0
EthMaximalistvip
· 01-05 05:39
Well... to be honest, on-chain verification sounds great, but I'm still quite worried. How does it feel to have a robot at home being audited every day?
View OriginalReply0
ApeDegenvip
· 01-05 05:33
Oh no, you're right. I'm also worried about robots running around the house... Basically, I just don't want to be sold and still help count the money, right? The on-chain verification system is really satisfying; at least I need to know what it's up to behind the scenes.
View OriginalReply0
View More
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
English
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)