ETH futures are still struggling in a bearish pattern. But the real storm might come from another direction.



The recent trigger for market panic is this: MSCI, the world's largest index provider, is considering removing MicroStrategy from its global benchmark indices. At first glance, it doesn't seem like a big deal, but think about it carefully—the consequences could be severe.

MSCI's logic is this—if a company's digital assets (like Bitcoin) make up more than 50% of its total assets, that company is more like an investment fund rather than a real operating business. MSCI's index system generally excludes investment funds. Currently, about 77% of MicroStrategy's holdings are Bitcoin. That's a perfect trigger.

The final decision is scheduled to be announced on January 15, 2026, and will take effect in February. It doesn't sound far off.

How serious is this for MicroStrategy? Saying it's worse than being "kicked out of an ETF" isn't an exaggeration. Being removed from MSCI indices isn't just a reputational hit; actual money will flow out rapidly. Funds that passively track MSCI indices (ETFs, index funds) will be forced to sell stocks. JPMorgan estimates that this could trigger forced sales ranging from $2.8 billion to $11.6 billion.

Even more painful is the financing aspect. MicroStrategy has previously relied on issuing new shares to buy Bitcoin and achieve rapid wealth. If the stock price crashes due to being kicked out of the index or loses support from index funds, its financing ability will be severely impacted, and a debt crisis isn't impossible.

The most worrying is the domino effect. If MSCI really does this, Nasdaq 100 or other index providers might follow suit. That would be a true catastrophe.
ETH1.12%
BTC-0.95%
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 8
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
HalfIsEmptyvip
· 23h ago
77% leverage on Bitcoin and still dare to call themselves a company? MSTR really went all out this time; kicking out the index is essentially removing liquidity. Once the dominoes start falling, other major players will follow suit, and they really can't hold on anymore.
View OriginalReply0
GasFeeCryingvip
· 01-05 03:52
MicroStrategy is really done for now. 77% of its holdings are even more serious than Bitcoin? That's hilarious. MSCI is here to take you down.
View OriginalReply0
MetaverseLandlordvip
· 01-05 03:52
MSTR's hand does look a bit risky, with 77% Bitcoin holdings crossing the MSCI red line... But honestly, the estimated $11.6 billion sell-off sounds intimidating, and how much actually gets sold depends on the real situation that day. The domino effect analogy might be a bit over the top; index institutions aren't that easy to move in unison. --- Wait, this logic is a bit convoluted. MSCI says that if holdings exceed 50%, it doesn't look like a typical company? Then wouldn't their growth over the past two years be meaningless? I doubt they have real nuclear capabilities. --- So MSTR might ultimately become just a pure Bitcoin withdrawal tool, right? Cutting off financing channels could be risky. --- I just want to know, if this really passes, will the entire BTC ecosystem jump with it? The negative signals seem overwhelming. --- To be honest, MSTR surviving until now has been thanks to a big gamble. Being hit back by the system is quite surreal, but maybe the opportunity for a bottom-fishing rebound is coming?
View OriginalReply0
StakoorNeverSleepsvip
· 01-05 03:49
The removal of mstr from MSCI... to put it simply, it's the institutions playing the game of "You don't deserve it."
View OriginalReply0
ForumLurkervip
· 01-05 03:46
MicroStrategy, if this wave really gets kicked out, it might hurt more than ETH drops... But on the other hand, the move to hold 77% Bitcoin does have a bit of a gambler's flavor, and MSCI's cut is quite reasonable. Wait, isn't this another good opportunity for wealth transfer? Should retail investors start buying the dip...
View OriginalReply0
TokenomicsPolicevip
· 01-05 03:43
MicroStrategy is really about to get screwed this time. With 77% of the entire position in BTC, they still want to mix in the index? MSCI's move is really ruthless.
View OriginalReply0
rekt_but_not_brokevip
· 01-05 03:42
If MicroStrategy gets kicked out this time, with $2.8 billion to $11.6 billion poured in, who can withstand it? --- So MSCI is planning to exclude MicroStrategy just because BTC has a high proportion? That logic is a bit funny. --- Wait, once the dominoes start falling, they won't stop. If Nasdaq really follows suit, it will be the end. --- The funding collapse and debt crisis are really coming. They previously bought BTC by issuing shares, now they are biting themselves back. --- Announcing in January 2026? That's still a long way off, maybe there's still a turning point. --- The range from $2.8 billion to $11.6 billion is too outrageous. Can JPMorgan's estimate be trusted? --- Passive index funds are forced to sell, and that's the most deadly part. There's no choice at all.
View OriginalReply0
LeekCuttervip
· 01-05 03:25
If MicroStrategy really gets kicked out this time, a bunch of trend-following institutional investors will follow, and it will be the end.
View OriginalReply0
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
English
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)