Recently, everyone has been discussing a very practical question: should a project use profits to buy back its own tokens?



Actually, the answer to this question is not complicated at all. The key is whether this money can truly promote the project's growth.

In other words, if this money is used to refine the product, expand the market, build a stronger team, or even acquire competitors, and these actions can lead to rapid growth, then it should be prioritized for these areas. Don't sacrifice growth opportunities just to please token holders; that would be putting the cart before the horse.

But conversely—if this money in the project's hands cannot generate any value growth, then the situation is completely different. The project should first ensure it has enough reserves to handle risks, and the remaining funds should be directly returned to token holders through buybacks or dividends. After all, token holders are the true supporters of the project.

In simple terms, there are two paths: either spend money to grow the cake, or distribute dividends to give back. It all depends on whether the project has the ability to seize growth opportunities.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 8
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
LucidSleepwalkervip
· 12h ago
That's correct, but I think most projects can't really distinguish whether they are the first or second type... In the end, they all end up neither investing money to develop products nor repurchasing, just internal fighting.
View OriginalReply0
CryingOldWalletvip
· 13h ago
Hmm... That's reasonable, but how many projects can really make a big cake these days? Most still prefer straightforward dividends for peace of mind.
View OriginalReply0
FomoAnxietyvip
· 01-04 17:50
That's correct, but the reality is that most projects are actually the second type... Talking about making a big cake is one thing, but in the end, after burning money for a long time, it's still the same. It's better to honestly buy back or distribute dividends, at least giving token holders some reassurance.
View OriginalReply0
liquidation_surfervip
· 01-04 17:48
To be honest, most projects are just fooling around, pretending they have growth opportunities when they actually don't, and then stubbornly holding onto the money without buybacks or dividends...
View OriginalReply0
GasFeeCryBabyvip
· 01-04 17:46
This logic seems fine, but in reality? Most projects are just fooling themselves into thinking there's growth potential, then secretly pouring money into buybacks to pump the price.
View OriginalReply0
VitaliksTwinvip
· 01-04 17:38
To be honest, it's not easy to hear this kind of rational analysis nowadays. Most projects are actually just buying back tokens to boost short-term prices, without considering whether they have any growth potential.
View OriginalReply0
ForkTonguevip
· 01-04 17:31
To be honest, most projects don't have the capability to make a big cake and still pretend to have a vision to deceive coin holders... Buybacks at least show sincerity, which is stronger than those who say "we want to change the world" and then fizzle out.
View OriginalReply0
Anon32942vip
· 01-04 17:23
To be honest, most projects don't have the capability to make a big cake, so buybacks have become the final cover-up.
View OriginalReply0
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
English
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)