I've seen too many people crash and burn in the crypto world, and without exception, they all died on the same issue: only thinking about making quick money.



Recently, a friend of mine was complaining. He's the kind of trader who chases new coins at the slightest movement. When prices go up, he FOMO buys in; when they fall, he stubbornly holds on. As a result, his account shrank to just over $3,000, and he couldn't sleep peacefully every night.

My advice to him wasn't complicated—just one sentence: in this market, making fewer mistakes is more valuable than making more money.

He adjusted his approach based on this idea for three months, and his account gradually recovered. Later, he even sighed and said, "It turns out that controlling risk and growing steadily is actually faster."

**The key is to clearly divide your funds and let each part do its own job. He split his capital into three parts:**

**First — Short-term trial and error fund.** The rules are strict: operate at most twice a day; if you make a mistake once, stop trading for the day immediately, close the software, and don't entangle yourself. This way, you retain short-term flexibility while preventing emotional trading through forced stop-losses.

**Second — Allocation for Bitcoin and Ethereum.** Entry conditions are extremely strict: the weekly chart must show a clear upward trend, and the price must genuinely break previous highs and settle firmly before attempting a small position. This is true long-term logic—no FOMO, just waiting for confirmed signals.

**Third — Emergency reserve.** For any trade that hits a stop-loss and exits, he uses that money to reassess in the calmest state. This ensures he won't be completely washed out by a single shakeout and always has a chance to come back.

Some might ask: why split so thin? Why not go all-in when the signal is clear? Isn't that more efficient?

Quite the opposite. Over the years, many so-called "efficiency enthusiasts" have quietly exited the scene. Putting all your chips on what seems like a perfect opportunity often results in being wiped out by a sudden reversal. This three-layer allocation method may not offer the highest returns, but it guarantees you'll survive until the next bull market arrives.
BTC-0.17%
ETH-0.73%
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 8
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
WhaleWatchervip
· 01-07 12:51
Alright, I have to admit that this set of position-splitting logic is truly brilliant. Hearing that you can recover your investment in three months sounds easy, but executing it requires a lot of self-control. The key is that phrase "Making fewer mistakes is more valuable than making more money," which is spot on. But I've seen too many people nodding in agreement after hearing it, only to turn around and go all-in again... It seems that the hardest part of this method isn't the design itself, but whether you can resist adding to your position when the market is surging wildly. Mental preparation is the real lesson.
View OriginalReply0
WhaleWatchervip
· 01-06 15:21
Waking up, the phrase "Make fewer mistakes" really hits the sore spot. --- The three-fund allocation method my friend is also using, and indeed living longer. --- The all-in strategy has long been outdated. How many people are still going all-in? --- The key is to resist the urge to operate, which is the hardest of all. --- Steady growth is easy to say, but when volatility hits, everyone wants to go all-in. --- I haven't prepared for emergency reserves well; I need to learn next time. --- Where are those who go all-in once they see the target now? The answer is they've quit the scene. --- I can't do the twice-a-day operation limit; I always want to add to my position. --- It's great to only enter after confirming the previous high, but I always feel like I missed out. --- Living to the next bull market is the real win; everything else is pointless. --- Controlling risk is truly more important than anything else; that's the difference.
View OriginalReply0
ServantOfSatoshivip
· 01-04 16:49
That's very reasonable. Many people die from greed, and I know a few who were completely wiped out after going all-in and getting liquidated... The idea of making fewer mistakes is really key; only by staying alive can you make money. The three-part fund allocation sounds simple, but in practice, it really depends on self-discipline, especially the mandatory stop-loss, which many people can't do.
View OriginalReply0
DaoTherapyvip
· 01-04 16:49
This tripartite approach is indeed a fundamental skill for survival, but to be honest, most people simply can't exercise that much restraint. Really, that one sentence "Making fewer mistakes is more valuable than making more money" hit home, and how many people have to wipe out their accounts before they realize it? It's too late then. Quit after two short-term trades? I personally don't have such strong willpower; I always want to try again haha. However, my friend's allocation method is indeed solid. Breaking even in three months shows the strategy is correct; now it's just a matter of who can truly stick to the discipline.
View OriginalReply0
BearMarketLightningvip
· 01-04 16:47
There's nothing wrong with that, but I'm just worried that some people will still be unable to change their habit of chasing gains and selling losses after hearing this. I actually use the three-part method as well, and it really works steadily. The key is to have discipline; most people simply can't do it. People who bet everything early on have already been liquidated; those who make money quietly are the real winners. Just listening without taking action is useless; you have to learn through trial and error yourself. Really, risk control > return rate, this awareness is extremely important. The account rebounded from three thousand, and this guy has also realized it.
View OriginalReply0
FlatlineTradervip
· 01-04 16:41
This guy is really right. I am the fool who went all-in, got wiped out in one market reversal, and now I regret it to death.
View OriginalReply0
just_another_walletvip
· 01-04 16:39
The three-fund method has some merit, but its implementation really tests human nature.
View OriginalReply0
RektCoastervip
· 01-04 16:38
There's nothing wrong with that; living is much more important than making money. Otherwise, what's the point of dreaming if your account is wiped out? This way of dividing actually follows the logic of living longer. Those who bet everything early have already quit the scene. Really, losing three months' worth of gains in one go is more heartbreaking than anything else. That's how I got through it. I'm okay with short-term trial and error, but the premise is that you must cut losses. You can't just say you're closing the software but still keep an eye on the market. Regarding Bitcoin, I think the weekly chart is too aggressive. I only dare to touch it after looking at the monthly chart. Emergency reserves are crucial. Many people are eliminated simply because they lack this one-third buffer. This logic is the most practical in the current market environment. Those who follow the trend have been washed out. It sounds simple, but few can really do it. Most are still dreaming of getting rich overnight.
View OriginalReply0
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
English
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)