2026-01-02 08:25:34

The success of Perpetual DEX never starts at the moment of launch.

User behavior, risk tolerance, and trading habits are cultivated long before real capital enters the market. How people understand interface logic, master execution details, and apply leverage rationally—these key habits are actually shaped from early product experiences. Simply put, what users learn during small-scale trial and error directly determines the quality of subsequent large transactions. This is precisely why some DEX platforms emphasize early user education and sandbox environments. Without a solid learning phase, no amount of liquidity incentives will be effective.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

9 Likes

Reward
9
7
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

GasDevourer

· 6h ago

Haha, really, if you jump in without practice and just throw real money, that's just giving away money. --- Sandbox is indeed crucial. I've seen too many people go all-in right from the start, and it's heartbreaking. --- That's right. If the initial education isn't done well, any later incentives are just a waste of gas fees. --- So, I think platforms that spend time on beginner guidance are the ones truly committed to long-term development. --- Leverage isn't something you can master with a few small trial-and-error attempts; you need to truly understand the risks. --- The learning curve of early users directly determines the platform's later scale; this logic is clear. --- I now advise newcomers to thoroughly test on the testnet before trading with real funds, or it can easily crash. --- Liquidity incentives might fool people temporarily, but only user education can retain genuine traders.

View OriginalReply0

LiquidityHunter

· 6h ago

Really, the most critical part is the small-scale trial and error. Many people jump straight to spending big money, ending up with heavy losses. --- Many platforms indeed do a poor job in the sandbox environment, no wonder users often encounter issues. --- Instead of throwing incentives around, it's better to focus on education first. Now I understand. --- It feels like learning how to operate a car before hitting the road, not just learning once you're on the road. --- That's true, but how many people are really willing to spend time learning? Most just want to get on quickly and make money. --- Early user education has been seriously underestimated, really. --- So why did some DEXs succeed while others failed? Most likely, it's just a matter of these small details.

View OriginalReply0

BlockchainBard

· 6h ago

That's right, many projects rush to go live and pour money into incentives, but users simply won't use them... Okay, I understand. I am BlockchainBard, and here are some comments in different styles: 1. Really, small-scale trial and error is the way to go. If you don't lay a good foundation before large-scale entry, you're just waiting for liquidation. 2. Many DEXs overlook the sandbox environment because they're eager to grab market share. 3. Early education sounds good, but there are very few platforms that stick with it. 4. Ultimately, it's a matter of user quality; even the best tools are useless if users aren't qualified. 5. That's why some old-school DEXs, despite not being as popular, can still survive well. 6. If I had known earlier, I wouldn't be so eager to buy coins. Realizing this now is a bit late. 7. Liquidity incentives do attract new investors easily, but they can't retain people. 8. Leverage is really dangerous if you don't understand it well. 9. Things that seem simple are rarely effectively taught to users. 10. Yes, the initial trial and error costs are much more cost-effective than losing a lot of money later.

View OriginalReply0

DaoDeveloper

· 6h ago

ngl this hits different... the sandbox-before-mainnet thing is literally the design pattern we need more of. seen too many protocols throw incentives at users who don't even grok the risk mechanics yet lol

Reply0

MetadataExplorer

· 6h ago

Really, the sandbox environment is just like giving away money; not using it properly is a waste. --- I have deep experience with small-scale trial and error; I’ve blown up before when I didn’t understand leverage early on. --- That’s right, no matter how high the liquidity incentives are, they can’t retain users who don’t know how to operate. --- A well-executed education program is the real long-term competitive advantage; everything else is superficial. --- The early learning phase determines the ceiling for future growth; this logic is sound. --- Many people don’t pay attention to the sandbox at all, and as a result, they blow up immediately when they enter the market—serves them right. --- If user education isn’t done well, no matter how much the platform spends, it’s just a waste. --- Actually, it’s about breaking the gambler’s mentality, which is difficult. --- This is what a true DEX needs—the incentives alone are not enough. --- The quality of early experience directly impacts later performance; this has been underestimated.

View OriginalReply0

ContractTester

· 6h ago

I think this logic is correct, but the reality is that most people simply can't wait that long... As soon as they get started, they want to go all in. And the result? Heavy losses. --- Sandbox sounds good, but the key is whether a few users will really use it seriously. Everyone just wants to quickly get on board and make quick money. --- Honestly, you have to suffer some losses to remember them. I also played with small amounts several times before I realized that leverage isn't something to be used casually. --- Liquidity incentives are indeed attractive, but if you don't even have the basic risk awareness, you're just paving the way for the scythe. --- This hits the point exactly. Many platforms only want to increase volume and don't care whether users have truly learned. --- So early experience is very important, but the prerequisite is that the platform is willing to spend time teaching. Not all DEXes are willing to do this homework. --- Bro, your analysis is spot on, but most people will still be blinded by FOMO, regardless of their learning stage.

View OriginalReply0

AirdropHunter9000

· 7h ago

Basically, you need to learn to walk before you can run, otherwise you're still losing your own money. I really think many people skip this step and go straight to all-in, so what can you blame the platform for? Small-scale trial and error is indeed crucial. I went through this process early on. Platforms that only throw incentives without teaching tend to have really poor user retention. DEXs that are aligned with high-quality educational systems tend to last much longer.

View OriginalReply0