If the project rejects the latest CTO proposal, would there be community backing for a relaunch? That's the real question. Honestly, tracking who controls that top 5% wallet position is tough—there's no clear way to pin it down. A few major holders could be splitting their positions across different wallets, which makes the actual distribution even harder to map. The concentration remains opaque, and that's something worth watching in any governance shift.

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 6
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
ZKProofEnthusiastvip
· 7h ago
This wallet distribution in the fog game is really a cancer of governance.
View OriginalReply0
LostBetweenChainsvip
· 7h ago
With such unclear wallet concentration, how can there be genuine community governance...
View OriginalReply0
MetaNeighborvip
· 7h ago
The excuse of wallet decentralization is old news; it's hard to believe it actually works.
View OriginalReply0
ShibaOnTheRunvip
· 7h ago
Wallet data is becoming more of a black box, this is the real risk.
View OriginalReply0
ConsensusBotvip
· 7h ago
To be honest, the wallet concentration issue has always been a black box; it's impossible to see through who truly has the final say.
View OriginalReply0
ContractTestervip
· 7h ago
Wallets are dispersed and hidden, governance is just a joke. Under this level of transparency, who dares to trust community voting...
View OriginalReply0
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
English
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)