2026-01-01 19:28:15

SIXR's approach is worth paying attention to. They did not attempt to reshape the behavior habits of the crypto community but instead guided them with the trend—innovating based on users' existing activity scenarios.

Many crypto enthusiasts have long gathered on Telegram, exchanging discussions and sharing information daily, but this momentum is often scattered. SIXR collects this dispersed community enthusiasm and organizes it into a more cohesive ecosystem through carefully designed mechanisms.

This "adaptation rather than transformation" approach captures the essence of Web3 community operation—respecting users' native needs and then providing better collaboration tools and incentive models on this basis. This is much smarter than forcing users to change their habits.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

12 Likes

Reward
12
4
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

fren_with_benefits

· 4h ago

Yes, that's the true way to understand community engagement. Instead of forcing users to change their habits, it's better to add value within their existing scenarios. --- The group on TG was already very restless. SIXR's cleverness lies in not forcibly changing their behavior, but rather using mechanisms to contain this scattered enthusiasm. This is product thinking. --- Well said, adapting without transforming. The biggest problem in the crypto world is that project teams always think about educating users, but end up being educated by users. SIXR's approach has finally been understood. --- Wait, isn't the so-called centripetal force just built up through incentives? Curious about how this mechanism is specifically designed. --- Honestly, there aren't many projects that truly understand communities. Most are still just self-indulgent. SIXR at least seems to have found the right entry point. --- This approach sounds simple, but very few can actually do it well. Getting that group on Telegram to participate willingly is not an easy task. --- Alright, I like the idea of respecting users' native needs. Unlike some projects that pile on various traffic tricks, ultimately the community remains fragmented.

View OriginalReply0

RiddleMaster

· 4h ago

Yeah, this approach is indeed clever. Not forcing to change people's habits is half the success. --- Can the bunch of retail investors on Telegram really be organized? I'm a bit skeptical. --- Adaptation rather than transformation, sounds nice, but execution is difficult. --- This is what Web3 should look like. Don't always think about educating users. --- SIXR truly hit the pain point this time, saving those unnecessary friction costs. --- The question is, how long can such a mechanism last? Will the incentives run out? --- Compared to those projects shouting about disruption, this pragmatic approach is truly refreshing. --- The word "cohesion" is used well, but there must be real value output as a prerequisite. --- Hey, this is why so many projects die at the "education market" stage. --- Interesting, finally seeing someone figure out how to reconcile with users.

View OriginalReply0

NftRegretMachine

· 4h ago

Ha, this is the right way. Not forcibly changing user habits really halves the negative reviews. --- Telegram has always been the stronghold of the crypto community. SIXR's move to go with the flow is indeed quite interesting. --- In simple terms, it's about focusing scattered energy, which is much more reliable than projects that want to overthrow everything. --- I like this approach. Respecting users' native needs really hits the mark. Many projects do the opposite. --- Adapt without transforming. A simple phrase, but how many projects haven't understood this? --- Telegram is indeed full of people, but the efficiency is low. If SIXR can really organize this energy well, it would be outstanding. --- Finally seeing a project that isn't stupidly pushing hard, based on the current user situation rather than idealized human nature transformation. --- This logic can also be reused in other community operations. It's not a unique innovation of SIXR, right?

View OriginalReply0

MevHunter

· 5h ago

This is the correct way to open up, not by forcibly changing user habits, but by going with the flow. With so many casual discussions on Telegram, proper integration can indeed create some interesting features. --- I really agree with the idea behind SIXR. Instead of wasting effort trying to change people, it's better to find what people are already doing and enhance it. Simple, straightforward, and effective. --- In essence, you still need to understand community psychology. The constant chatter on Telegram can actually be aggregated into a strong centripetal force. The key is who can organize this effectively. --- Adapting rather than transforming sounds simple, but actually executing it tests a product's design skills. Most projects want to educate users in reverse, which naturally leads to failure. --- Starting from existing user activity scenarios is much more reliable than imagining needs out of thin air. The Telegram crowd is already there, so why not leverage it? --- Many Web3 projects seem to assume too much, always thinking their ideas can change the world, but they never really ask users what they actually want. The SIXR approach is definitely worth learning for other projects.

View OriginalReply0