In that moment in 2008, Elon Musk stood at the edge of the cliff. Tesla and SpaceX both faced imminent disaster—repeated technical failures and dwindling funds. The voices on Wall Street and Silicon Valley were harsh: scammers, lunatics, gamblers. But he refused to give up. He convinced capital with one grand story after another, betting everything on the fourth rocket launch. He won the gamble. NASA's contract came through. A resurrection.



The irony is this: almost every country wants its own Elon Musk, but going back more than a decade, which society around the world dared to let one person repeatedly blow up rockets and keep pouring money on the brink of a funding collapse?

The story is similar to that of Steve Jobs in his youth. Bad temper, prickly personality, the kind of person Silicon Valley would rather ignore. He fell countless times, but someone always was willing to bet on him. In the end, he became a legend.

There are also people like this domestically. Jia Yueting over a decade ago was into ecological car manufacturing, with ideas so ahead of their time that few could understand. Within a few years, he was kicked out by the market. But now, look at what those big tech companies are doing? Their approach is no different from his back then. It’s just that a new era has arrived, and the environment suddenly permits it.

The key difference is actually quite brutal: can a society truly tolerate the failure of explorers? How high is the tolerance for mistakes within a system?

In a soil that emphasizes guaranteed wins, where success is king and failure is the enemy, it’s very hard to cultivate true business leaders. But in places that allow room for error, failure itself is part of trial and error. That’s the real secret to nurturing heroes.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 4
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
IntrovertMetaversevip
· 6h ago
Can't push anymore, still someone dares to lose money. Elon Musk's move was truly a gamble, replaced domestically by being eaten up early. The irony is that he keeps talking about innovation every day, but the tolerance for mistakes is ridiculously low. If the Jia Yueting incident happened now, it would probably have a different ending, it's a problem of the times. The system determines whether heroes can emerge, impressive. Where connections > technology, nothing can really be incubated. So we're still watching Musk's story, but there's nothing to see here. Monsters only appear where failure is valuable.
View OriginalReply0
YieldFarmRefugeevip
· 6h ago
Basically, it's a matter of tolerance for errors. The US dares to bet on a lunatic, while if we do, we're immediately blacklisted. Talent and institutional design are two different things. Jia Yueting was truly ahead of his time back then. Elon Musk can blow up rockets four times and still come back to life; elsewhere, he would have been ruined and disgraced long ago. That's why Silicon Valley can always produce monsters, while domestically, it's much harder to tolerate voices of trial and error.
View OriginalReply0
MevHuntervip
· 6h ago
Ah, basically it's a game of tolerance for error. The US dares to bet on a lunatic, but would the domestic market dare to? That hits hard. Jia Yueting really was born at the wrong time. Elon Musk just bet on the right era. In another place, he would have been killed early. Tolerance for error—that's the essence. Honestly, Silicon Valley's level of tolerance is truly different. Rockets blow up, yet they can still continue to raise funds. If it were in China, they'd probably be held accountable immediately. An environment that allows failure is what produces great people. That's a point I deeply agree with. So, after the wave of hard technology arrives, everything has reversed. The logic remains the same, but with a different attitude, things change.
View OriginalReply0
BearMarketMonkvip
· 6h ago
At the end of the day, it's still an ecosystem problem. If we had started ten years earlier, there might have been no way out. In the West, even rocket launches can secure funding to continue, but here, a single failure means a death sentence. Boss Jia was forced out by these rules. The fault tolerance rate, frankly, is about checks and balances. Without them, how can entrepreneurs have room to make mistakes? Perhaps it's due to different national conditions. Let's take it slow; things will eventually change. After achieving financial freedom, I also want to gamble on an unreliable dream. For now, I still have to survive. This is why top talents flock to Silicon Valley. The environment of survival of the fittest can indeed produce Elon Musk. Ironically, everyone is now learning—what's there to learn? The soil is completely different.
View OriginalReply0
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
English
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)