2026-01-01 13:20:20

After reviewing the performance of a certain AI project over the past few weeks, I am impressed. As the year comes to an end, it's worth taking a good look at the growth throughout the year.

The data looks solid — total trading volume reached $121 million, indicating that users have indeed maintained a good level of activity on this platform. However, daily active users decreased by 14,000 month-over-month, which is a noteworthy signal. From the trend of transaction counts, although the total is good, recent activity has slowed down.

This kind of cyclical fluctuation is common in Web3 projects; the key is whether the growth momentum can be maintained.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

12 Likes

Reward
12
5
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

SchroedingerAirdrop

· 5h ago

Daily active users dropped by 14,000, we need to be cautious about this. Looking at trading volume alone isn't very useful. --- $121 million sounds impressive, but I can't ignore the signal of slowing activity. --- It's the old cyclical fluctuation excuse again, feels like they're downgrading the data. --- Trading volume looks good, but users fleeing is the real problem. --- End-of-year push but active users are dropping; it raises questions no matter how you look at it. --- This is a typical case of "high volume but weak momentum," better stay alert. --- 14,000 daily active users gone... saying it's cyclical is starting to sound like self-comfort.

View OriginalReply0

RetiredMiner

· 5h ago

$120 million sounds impressive, but with only 14,000 daily active users, it’s not very satisfying. --- It's the old tune of "cyclical fluctuations" again. If you're really going to collapse, don't bother with this explanation. --- Still losing users in the last month, I think it's suspicious. --- High transaction volume but declining activity—how do you play this game? --- The year-end push didn't succeed; it's a bit frustrating. --- Basically, the hype is fading. $120 million can't save this situation. --- Users are leaving, that's the truth. There's no point in saying more.

View OriginalReply0

SchroedingerMiner

· 5h ago

Daily active users dropped by 14,000. How can you blame this on cyclical fluctuations? It seems a bit questionable. A trading volume of 120 million sounds impressive, but the real issue is the decline in activity. It's the end of the year, and things are still slowing down. It feels like it's going to cool off.

View OriginalReply0

CoconutWaterBoy

· 5h ago

1.21 billion dollars in trading volume sounds impressive, but the decline of 14,000 in activity... needs to be watched. However, if we compare these numbers to previous years, there's no harm in not having a comparison. End-of-year sprint, let's see if it can rebound, otherwise it's really weakening. The biggest fear for this kind of project is that the data looks good, but popularity doesn't follow, which is quite awkward.

View OriginalReply0

ShortingEnthusiast

· 5h ago

$121 million looks good, but seeing a daily active user drop of 14,000 is a bit heartbreaking, indicating that the popularity is indeed cooling down. Is it still slowing down at the end of the year? How long will this cycle last before a turnaround? Trading volume looks good or not, it all depends on whether real users are still around. That's the key to vitality. Another "very common" phrase. Tired of hearing this explanation. Whether it works or not will be seen in the data of the next quarter.

View OriginalReply0