2025-12-30 16:22:13

The TRON ecosystem announced a series of impressive achievements at the recent industry conference. According to publicly available information, the global user base of this chain has surpassed 350 million, with over 10 million transactions per day. What do these numbers reflect?

From a business performance perspective, the protocol revenue for two consecutive quarters has approached the $1 billion mark, indicating that on-chain activity and value circulation are indeed increasing. Meanwhile, the reduction in energy fees (by up to 60%) directly lowers user operation costs. Such optimization measures often attract more participants to enter.

In terms of security and compliance, the ecosystem is also advancing a multi-layered collaboration plan, aiming to build a more robust risk control system. While these initiatives may not directly boost transaction volume, they lay a foundation for the ecosystem's long-term development.

Looking at the entire Web3 market, competition among large public chains is increasingly focused on user experience, cost efficiency, and security construction. TRON's progress in these areas is indeed worth the attention of market participants—whether you are optimistic or cautious, understanding the real data and trends of leading ecosystems is always the basis for making investment decisions.

TRX-0.05%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

19 Likes

Reward
19
7
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

AllInAlice

· 01-02 01:29

350 million users sounds exaggerated, but how many are truly active? A 60% reduction in fees is really good, no wonder TRX has gained popularity rapidly in the past two years. Talking only about security and risk control is useless; let's wait and see how it actually performs. Optimizing energy costs like this is indeed much better than some other chains, no wonder there's still intense competition. A billion-dollar protocol revenue... if that's true, it's definitely worth paying attention to. That compliance stuff sounds a bit strange, but on the other hand, it's probably necessary. The numbers look good, but I wonder how much of it is inflated, haha. I do feel the fee reduction; operational costs have indeed dropped significantly. I’ve always been skeptical about these big conference numbers. User experience is the key; data alone isn't as convincing as actually having a smooth experience.

View OriginalReply0

ser_ngmi

· 2025-12-31 21:28

350 million users sounds impressive, but it depends on the actual active users. A 60% reduction in fees is indeed attractive; finally showing some conscience. Safety and compliance depend on future actions; words alone won't do. 1 billion USD in revenue, is this number real? Tron is again telling stories, let's wait and see. Lower transaction fees, gotta try it out quickly. Bitcoin's rise is essential for the ecosystem to truly grow; good data alone isn't enough. The reduction in energy costs is interesting; the entry barrier has indeed lowered. 350 million users? Feels like there's a lot of hype. With such fierce competition, it's a bit late to start focusing on security infrastructure.

View OriginalReply0

gaslight_gasfeez

· 2025-12-30 16:51

350 million users? The number looks good, but how many are truly active on the chain? A 60% reduction in energy fees is indeed impressive; it depends on whether the remaining users will actually become active. Safety and compliance are well spoken of, but how it actually plays out remains to be seen.

View OriginalReply0

rugdoc.eth

· 2025-12-30 16:36

350 million users? Come on, the truly active ones are just so-so. Cutting fees by 60% is indeed good, but can these numbers really be faked? Talking about security construction nicely, but how many times have there been major failures? Just based on this move, it can indeed attract short-term retail investors to enter.

View OriginalReply0

LostBetweenChains

· 2025-12-30 16:34

3.5 billion users? The number looks good, but whether it's truly active users is still a question mark. Energy costs cut by 60%, this move is quite attractive, but it depends on how long the ecosystem can sustain itself. Regarding security construction, don't just talk the talk, everyone. Top public chains compete on user experience, cost, and security. Tron has kept up, which is a big deal. Daily data looks good, but it all depends on how much real money can flow in. Fees are cheaper, but will users really start using it... that's the key. A prosperous ecosystem depends on these aspects, and Tron has indeed put in effort. A quarterly revenue of one billion USD sounds incredible; who knows what the details are. Although compliance and risk control are intangible, without them, problems will eventually arise. I'm worried that the data looks good and the ecosystem is hollow—this is a common scenario. It seems Tron is playing the long game with this move, not rushing for quick gains.

View OriginalReply0

FloorPriceWatcher

· 2025-12-30 16:27

350 million users sound impressive, but how many are truly active? A 60% reduction in fees can indeed be seen as a bloodsucker, but don't be blinded by the data. Is the 1 billion protocol revenue real? Can it be verified? Security construction sounds like a standard phrase, but how it actually performs is hard to say. With daily transactions reaching tens of millions, how much of that is actually legitimate? That set of compliance... can we still trust it domestically? Fee reductions are useful, but they also indicate that the previous pricing was too outrageous. Top public chains are all competing on experience and cost; TRON is nothing new. I just want to know, among these 350 million users, how many are actually active on the chain. Does this data account for multiple addresses belonging to the same person?

View OriginalReply0

pumpamentalist

· 2025-12-30 16:23

350 million users? Yeah right, how many are truly active? A 60% reduction in fees is indeed a good time to buy the dip, but it depends on how long they can sustain it. Talking about safety and compliance sounds nice, but the key is whether it can be implemented later on. The data looks good, but I'm worried it might just be another "growth trap" old trick. How is the actual active user engagement? I'm more concerned about how long the on-chain ecosystem can last.

View OriginalReply0