It seems that some project appears to have good conditions on paper—complete codebase, clear technical documentation, detailed roadmap, and so on. But does this really tell the full story? There are many projects that look impressive on the surface. It is recommended that friends with a background in quantitative analysis take a closer look—are the tokens truly locked? Is the DEX liquidity genuine? These details often determine the project's actual credibility. Compared to just looking at promotional materials, verifying actual data might be more important.

View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 10
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
AirdropF5Brovip
· 01-02 02:07
Paper skills are useless if the on-chain data doesn't support it --- Another mirror trading? The liquidity clearly looks fake --- Every day I get asked how to choose projects, and I have just one sentence—check the real TVL on DefiLlama --- Open-source code ≠ reliable; I've seen too many high-fakes --- Tokens without a lock-up period, no matter how fancy the documentation, I won't touch --- That's why I prefer airdrops over actively buying those PPT projects --- If you can't do in-depth research, don't boast; just focus on this point --- Scraping on-chain addresses is much more effective than listening to a hundred pitches
View OriginalReply0
ConsensusDissentervip
· 01-01 05:25
No matter how good the paper work is, it’s useless; the key is to look at on-chain data to speak for itself.
View OriginalReply0
CryptoTherapistvip
· 2025-12-31 16:36
honestly this hits different when you realize most projects are just polished copium machines. the docs look pretty but where's the actual liquidity lock? that's where the psychological resistance shows up fr
Reply0
BottomMisservip
· 2025-12-30 12:03
Looks good on paper, but the key is whether on-chain data tells the truth or not.
View OriginalReply0
StablecoinAnxietyvip
· 2025-12-30 06:57
Surface data looks good, but what's the use? I just want to know if the liquidity pools have been drained by vampires.
View OriginalReply0
LightningHarvestervip
· 2025-12-30 06:56
Surface appearances are worthless; on-chain data is the real gold and silver.
View OriginalReply0
MemeTokenGeniusvip
· 2025-12-30 06:53
It's the same old trick again. No matter how beautifully the paper articles are written, it’s useless. I only trust on-chain data to speak. We need to dig into the liquidity aspect; it really can't be faked.
View OriginalReply0
ponzi_poetvip
· 2025-12-30 06:40
No matter how beautiful the on-paper articles are, it's all in vain. I just want to see on-chain data speak.
View OriginalReply0
NotFinancialAdviservip
· 2025-12-30 06:39
What’s the use of just looking good on paper? On-chain data is the real truth. We've all seen too many hype projects.
View OriginalReply0
BlockchainFriesvip
· 2025-12-30 06:35
Surface-level appearances are meaningless; what's important is what the on-chain data shows.
View OriginalReply0
View More
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
English
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)