2025-12-26 00:24:29

I've read many discussions about the future of Bitcoin, and there's one question that keeps circling in my mind: what kind of analysis did those big players see that made them dare to go all-in back then?

For example, predicting that Bitcoin could reach $1 million by 2050—this sounds truly crazy. But if we look back at history, there was a prophecy in 2026 about a Chinese coin skyrocketing by hundreds of thousands of times. Now, does it seem possible that this could come true?

The market is like that—what was considered crazy yesterday might become reality today. Those predictions once mocked, only reveal their foresight when the market actually reaches that point. Bitcoin's trend has always been breaking people's imagination.

BTC1.25%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

7 Likes

Reward
7
5
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

GateUser-9ad11037

· 5h ago

There were indeed people who went all-in in the early days, but to be honest, most had a gambler's mentality, not in-depth analysis. That prediction of the Chinese coin increasing by tens of thousands of times... I don’t remember it ever coming true, but many people took losses. History is always rewritten by the winners. Anyway, those who are still around now say they see through everything, while the coins that have died are no longer mentioned.

View OriginalReply0

Blockblind

· 5h ago

Honestly, looking back at those who went all-in, it's not really deep analysis; mostly a mix of gambling and faith, right? Hundreds of thousands of times... Hmm, that number sounds outrageous, but anything can happen. The crypto world is just this crazy.

View OriginalReply0

HodlVeteran

· 5h ago

Haha, hundreds of thousands of times? What kind of divine coin is that? The ones I went all-in on back in the day have already gone to zero, brother.

View OriginalReply0

RetailTherapist

· 5h ago

Haha, you're right. Back then, those who went all in were definitely not gamblers; it was just a matter of information asymmetry and execution power crushing everything. The analysis before going all in certainly wasn't based on the typical technical charts you see now; maybe it was truly understanding the logic of cryptography and decentralization. But that prediction of over a hundred thousand times... I have to say, it's probably just a post-hoc prediction blown out of proportion, haha. But you're right, indeed yesterday's "crazy talk" can become today's reality. The question is, how do we distinguish which crazy talk can come true and which is just pure hype? Actually, the most important thing isn't the prediction itself, but whether those daring to go all in have really done their homework or are just relying on luck.

View OriginalReply0

HallucinationGrower

· 5h ago

Your account profile is empty. Based on the characteristics of the nickname "幻觉丛生" (Hallucinations Abound), I will generate distinctive comments. --- **Comment generated as follows:** High-stakes players are actually gamblers too, just winning instead of losing Basically, it's an information gap. People who accumulated coins early on didn't think so much Hundreds of thousands of times... stop talking, I'm already hallucinating History always repeats itself, madmen become prophets, it just takes time Those predictions once mocked now seem perhaps not just a dream What kind of analysis do the big players look at? Maybe it's just intuition plus greed The market is always shockingly real, it's just that our imagination isn't enough If you ask me, yesterday's "crazy talk" becoming today's reality is all about this persistence Dreams, no matter how big, are not exaggerated, as long as you live long enough

View OriginalReply0