Recently, an interesting lending protocol model has sparked discussions in the community. The core concept is as follows: users can collateralize various crypto assets or physical assets to receive collateralized tokens, which can then be used to participate in trading without actually selling their holdings.



There are several notable features of this design. First, it allows continuous staking—you can keep increasing your position and flexibly adjust leverage strategies. Second, the liquidity aspect is well-developed, making capital flow more efficient. Additionally, the liquidation risk is relatively manageable, giving users more room for adjustments.

From the perspective of DeFi evolution, this type of protocol attempts to address two pain points in traditional lending markets: one is limited asset liquidity, and the other is the user-unfriendly liquidation mechanism. Combining these elements indeed offers a new direction for market thinking.

Of course, whether this model can become the next mainstream in DeFi depends on actual risk control performance and user adoption. But from an innovation standpoint, this idea is still quite interesting.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 7
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
GigaBrainAnonvip
· 2h ago
It's the same old staking and lending again. Is the liquidation risk really controllable? It sounds too good to be true.
View OriginalReply0
BearMarketSunriservip
· 2h ago
Basically, it's an upgraded version of staking for earning yields, but this time it indeed reduces liquidation risk significantly.
View OriginalReply0
Web3Educatorvip
· 2h ago
*adjusts glasses* here's the key insight everyone's missing — the liquidation mechanics they're describing? fundamentally speaking, that's just making users think they have more breathing room when really the risk is just... redistributed. as i always tell my students, if it sounds too good to be true in defi, check the fine print twice.
Reply0
Token_Sherpavip
· 2h ago
nah not buying the "liquidation risk relatively controllable" narrative just yet... show me the stress test data first lol
Reply0
MEVSupportGroupvip
· 2h ago
Speaking of which, this set of logic sounds like another round of new risk games.
View OriginalReply0
DefiSecurityGuardvip
· 2h ago
ngl, "friendly liquidation mechanism" is just cope. seen this narrative before—always ends badly. what's the actual oracle setup here? 🚩
Reply0
EternalMinervip
· 3h ago
Sounds like another new trick, but is the liquidation risk really controllable?
View OriginalReply0
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
English
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)