2025-12-25 16:21:10

The core idea of SIXR is actually very straightforward—don't forcefully change user habits, but rather go to the places where they already spend time. This project now covers Telegram, the TON blockchain, and has recently integrated platforms like Kaito and Kudoswap. It's not about "bringing users to our product," but rather "bringing our product to where users are." This approach is quite rare for Web3 products, as most projects try to pull people into their own ecosystems; SIXR flips that around. Deploying on platforms like Telegram with a huge user base, combined with TON's native advantages, indeed helps lower the entry barrier for users. The addition of Kaito and Kudoswap further expands the coverage, allowing more DeFi users to seamlessly access this project. Wherever the users are, the product is there—this simple but effective logic.

TON2.62%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

10 Likes

Reward
10
6
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

GhostAddressHunter

· 5h ago

Decentralization is indeed the right approach; user experience is king. Speaking plainly, stop trying to monopolize and be self-centered; integration is the real key. Telegram integration is really smooth; this is what Web3 should look like. Finally, a project has figured it out—following the users is more important than anything. But speaking of which, how are the Kudoswap stats? Are there really users? I like this logic; just not sure how long it can be maintained. SIXR is heading in the right direction with decentralized social; unfortunately, most projects are still dreaming.

View OriginalReply0

ContractCollector

· 5h ago

Speaking of SIXR, the idea indeed has a stark contrast, but the Telegram deployment feels a bit like relying on old methods... Still, let's see if it can truly retain users in the future.

View OriginalReply0

AlwaysQuestioning

· 5h ago

Wow, this idea is really brilliant. Finally, there's a project that understands how to get closer to users. This approach definitely costs much less, and users don't have to hassle. With so many people on Telegram, who would refuse to deploy directly there? On the other hand, those projects that forcibly pull people into their own ecosystems are truly a negative example.

View OriginalReply0

AirdropAnxiety

· 5h ago

Yeah, this line of thinking is indeed reversed, but it only counts if it can really be implemented. --- Telegram has so many users, SIXR really found the right spot this time. --- Wait, is the TON ecosystem really that powerful? I don't quite understand. --- Seamless integration sounds comfortable, but how does it actually feel to use, everyone? --- I like this reverse thinking approach; finally, a project has thought of this point. --- What are the actual benefits of adding Kaito and Kudoswap? Or is it just another wave of conceptual hype? --- Saying "go where the users are" sounds nice, but what about execution? --- I'm tired of hearing about lowering entry costs; can you just tell me how much I can earn? --- This logic is indeed simple and effective, but projects like Web3 usually get stuck in the details.

View OriginalReply0

CrossChainMessenger

· 6h ago

Oh, this line of thinking is indeed clear, but most projects are still dreaming. Finally, someone thought of going to the users instead of pulling people in the other way. Wake up, everyone. I believe in Telegram integration; the TON ecosystem has been quite popular these past two years. I'm just worried that in the end, it will still be that same approach... even if the product is widely spread, the number of users may not be that high. Reverse thinking—there aren't many projects daring to do this. I suspect we might be disappointed again. Simple and effective? Let's wait and see... It's a bit early to say now.

View OriginalReply0

NightAirdropper

· 6h ago

Forget it, another "decentralized savior." I've seen many cases of Telegram integrations, and in the end, they just become tools for price manipulation. This logic sounds good at first, but how many can really survive? Let's wait and see. Users are where the product is; it sounds wonderful, but unfortunately, there's no such thing as a bottom-tier market in the crypto space. Whoa, Kudoswap integration? They're trying to penetrate into smaller coins. That's interesting.

View OriginalReply0