
BTP stands for "Blockchain Transmission Protocol." It is designed to securely transmit messages and value between different blockchains, transforming each cross-chain request into a verifiable and executable event on the destination chain.
You can think of BTP as an intercity postal system: the source chain acts like the sending city, packaging up content and issuing a receipt; the relay acts as the courier, delivering the "package and receipt" to the destination chain; the destination chain is like the receiving city, checking the receipt and signing off before executing the corresponding action, such as minting an equivalent token or calling a smart contract.
BTP is crucial because blockchains operate in a multi-chain world—different chains are like separate cities, with data and assets dispersed across networks. To enable true interoperability for decentralized applications (dApps), a reliable method is needed to facilitate messaging and asset transfers between chains.
Without BTP or similar mechanisms, cross-chain operations often rely on manual intervention or centralized intermediaries, which increases risks like incorrect addresses, asset loss, or concentrated trust. BTP leverages standardized smart contracts and verification processes to make cross-chain transactions on-chain and traceable, reducing human error and single points of failure.
The core process of BTP involves: the source chain recording an event and generating a verifiable "proof," a relay transmitting the message and proof to the destination chain, and the destination chain validating the proof via a smart contract before executing the corresponding action.
A "smart contract" is an on-chain program that automates transactions based on predefined rules; the "relay" acts like a courier network, transferring messages from the source chain to the destination chain without holding asset control rights.
The "cross-chain proof" serves as a receipt and stamp, demonstrating that a specific event has occurred on the source chain. A "light client" functions like an abridged ledger of another chain, allowing the destination chain to verify the receipt's authenticity using minimal data. Only after successful verification will the destination chain execute actions such as minting mapped tokens or invoking target contracts.
For example: if an asset transfer is initiated on the ICON chain, the source chain's contract logs the event; a relay captures the event and proof, transmitting them to Ethereum; then, a verification contract on Ethereum checks the proof and mints corresponding ERC-20 tokens to the specified address.
BTP enables dApps to initiate actions on Chain A and complete results on Chain B. Typical use cases include cross-chain transfers, cross-chain lending liquidation notifications, or purchasing an NFT on one chain and claiming entitlements on another.
In trading scenarios, users may bridge tokens to Ethereum before conducting on-chain trades or deposits. It is essential that tokens generated through cross-chain transfers match the specifications of the target network to avoid failures or delays caused by network incompatibility.
For instance, when using Gate, if you plan to transfer assets from one chain to Ethereum for deposit or trading, make sure to select a deposit network that matches the target chain after bridging, and verify the token contract address to avoid mistakenly depositing tokens from non-Ethereum networks to Ethereum addresses.
Cross-chain asset transfers can be completed in several steps. The key is to ensure token and network compatibility, sufficient fees, and correct contract addresses.
Step 1: Confirm Token Support on Target Chain. Check cross-chain tools or official documentation to ensure there is a corresponding mapping contract and symbol for your token on the destination chain.
Step 2: Authorize and Initiate on Source Chain. Use your wallet to connect with the source chain application, approve token allowance for the cross-chain contract, submit the cross-chain transfer transaction, and save the transaction hash.
Step 3: Wait for Relay Transmission and Destination Chain Verification. The relay delivers the message to the destination chain; the destination chain’s verification contract checks the proof. You will need to pay a small gas fee on the destination chain during this step.
Step 4: Claim or Receive Tokens on Destination Chain. Some solutions require manual claiming of tokens on the destination chain; others will automatically mint tokens to your address. Check that your token contract and balance are correct.
Step 5: Further Use or Deposit. When depositing assets on Gate, select the same network as your bridged token. Start with a small test transaction to confirm receipt and correct contract address before proceeding with larger amounts.
You will need a multi-chain compatible wallet and a small amount of fee tokens on both chains. For example, initiating transactions from the source chain requires source chain gas fees; verification or claiming on the destination chain also requires its respective gas fees.
You also need accurate contract addresses and official entry points. It is recommended to obtain cross-chain interfaces and contract information directly from project websites or documentation to avoid phishing links. Be prepared for longer processing times and ensure a stable network environment, as cross-chain operations may take longer than same-chain transfers.
There are risks of smart contract vulnerabilities in cross-chain operations. Flaws in contract logic or implementation could lead to incorrect minting or asset lockup. Always opt for audited solutions with community validation and monitor for project updates.
Relay or verification network instability can cause delays or transaction backlogs if relays go offline. Allow extra time for transfers, and consider alternate routes when necessary.
Incorrect address or network selection is a common risk—different chains use different address formats and token contracts. Depositing tokens onto unsupported networks can result in asset loss. Always conduct small test transactions first and verify target chains and contract addresses.
Price volatility and slippage risks are heightened in scenarios combining bridging with trading. Although bridging itself does not set prices, immediate trading after bridging exposes you to market fluctuations and compounded transaction fees.
BTP focuses on “standardizing cross-chain messaging using on-chain contracts and verification,” functioning as an interoperability framework. Traditional “cross-chain bridges” often use a “lock-and-mint” approach that relies on multisig or guardian sets, concentrating trust.
IBC typically employs bidirectional light client verification—akin to two cities establishing mutual customs checkpoints—offering stronger security but higher integration costs, suitable for chains within the same technical ecosystem. CCIP uses off-chain networks to route messages and execute them on-chain, emphasizing scalability and developer experience but relying on its own network’s security model.
Each solution presents trade-offs in security strength, integration complexity, speed, and cost. Choose based on your target chain compatibility, contract ecosystem, and security requirements.
As of 2024, cross-chain communication has evolved from single-asset bridges toward “general message passing.” BTP-like protocols are increasingly focused on securely enabling arbitrary calls across chains. Emerging trends include stronger on-chain verification (such as light clients and optimistic validation), modular security with restaking as added protection layers, and more developer-friendly SDKs and standard interfaces.
With multi-chain applications proliferating, BTP is shifting from a simple “bridging tool” to foundational infrastructure for multi-chain communication. Security and composability remain central themes. Users should stay informed about official updates, audits, and network statuses—and maintain habits like small-scale testing, network consistency checks, and address verification to mitigate risks.
BTP uses a "Relay Chain" as an information hub to guarantee secure asset movement between blockchains. When transferring from Chain A to Chain B, BTP first locks assets on the source chain, verifies transaction legitimacy via the relay chain, then mints equivalent assets on the destination chain. The entire process is automated by BTP smart contracts; users only need to perform one operation to complete a cross-chain transfer.
No. BTP is integrated into various dApps and wallets so beginners can use it just like any standard transfer function. On platforms supporting BTP (such as Gate), simply select your target chain, enter the amount and address—the system handles all cross-chain logic automatically. It's recommended to start with a small test transaction before moving larger amounts.
BTP implements dual-layer security through its "Relay Chain + Smart Contract Verification" mechanism. The relay chain independently verifies every cross-chain transaction’s legitimacy, greatly reducing single point-of-failure risks. Compared with schemes relying on single validators, BTP’s decentralized design makes attacks harder and more costly. However, all cross-chain solutions carry technical risks; it is not advisable to keep large sums in transit long-term.
BTP currently supports major networks including ICON, Ethereum, Polygon, BSC (Binance Smart Chain), Arbitrum, among others. Supported networks may vary by platform—always verify source and target chain support on Gate or other platforms before initiating transfers.
BTP transfers generally confirm within 5–30 minutes depending on congestion on both source and target chains. This is faster than many traditional bridges that may require several hours. However, during peak periods delays can occur—users may wait or opt for alternative solutions in such cases.


