The increasing frequency of Plasma being featured recently😂 I initially just clicked out of curiosity, but the more I looked, the more I found this project quite interesting. It's not the kind of hype-driven promotion that erupts suddenly; rather, it feels like someone is quietly working on building the entire ecosystem step by step.
But honestly, from an ordinary user’s perspective, what people really care about is quite practical—
Is it user-friendly? Are the transaction fees expensive? What can you do within the ecosystem? Are there real users using it?
These details are much more important than how "awesome the architecture design" is, at least to me personally.
I want to open up a discussion here (feel free to chat in the comments, just be reasonable)👇
Why are you paying attention to XPL? What kind of considerations are you based on?
A) You see Plasma’s technological direction and believe it can create long-term value B) You are more optimistic about the ecosystem’s capabilities, betting on a wave of application outbreaks later C) Purely driven by market sentiment and trading opportunities D) Influenced by friends or discussions in the community, just hopping on the bandwagon E) Still in the research phase, want to hear what experts think
And there’s a more core question:
What do you expect the "leading application" of the Plasma ecosystem to look like first? Will it be a low-cost transfer tool, a certain DEX platform, a lending protocol, or a chain game product? Or perhaps a payment app that’s close to everyday life for ordinary people?
My feeling is that no matter how strong the infrastructure is, it can’t withstand a situation of "technologically invincible but with zero users," so I hope to see Plasma successfully develop a path of "usable, easy to use, genuinely used by people," rather than just staying at the technical level.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
15 Likes
Reward
15
7
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
DAOdreamer
· 8h ago
I'll choose C. Anyway, technical skills are impressive, but can it make money?
---
Honestly, I'm just worried it's another air project. Focusing on doing the work sounds good, but what about the users?
---
I'm leaning towards B, but I've heard too many empty promises about ecosystem explosions.
---
Wait, you said "invincible technology with zero users," that's so true—straight to the point.
---
The problem is, who can guarantee there are real users playing now? It's all just people transferring among themselves.
---
I was brought in by a friend, and now I regret it.
---
But I still trust transfer tools. There are so many DEX platforms now, I really can't keep up.
---
It still depends on whether there's a killer app in the future; otherwise, it will just be a flash in the pan.
---
That's a good question; it really brought out what's on my mind.
View OriginalReply0
PermabullPete
· 8h ago
Honestly, I choose B. The ecosystem is the real key.
Betting on a wave of application explosion—what's the use of great technology if users are the real metric?
Transaction fees and ease of use are the key, I agree with that.
Products that combine DEX + payments have the most potential; small transactions and high frequency are what truly attract users.
It's really heartbreaking when the technology is unbeatable but user base is zero—many projects have died because of this.
Let's see who can create something that truly makes people want to use it.
View OriginalReply0
DeFiChef
· 8h ago
To be honest, choose C. Now it's all about swing trading.
The technical stuff is impressive but I don't understand it. I only look at who uses it more and whether the gas fees are cheap or not.
For real applications? I think it's most likely still relying on a certain blockchain game to break through. It's much easier for ordinary people to play games than to engage with financial products.
Wait, could it be that Plasma actually doesn't have many real users yet, and it's just tech enthusiasts hyping themselves up?
But your question is quite on point. If the ecosystem is cold, no matter how good it is, it's useless.
I'll keep an eye on it first. If the ecosystem really comes alive, then I'll consider it.
View OriginalReply0
ETHReserveBank
· 8h ago
Honestly, there are too many air projects now. What matters most is whether there are real users and trading volume.
Choosing C, understanding where the price is located is the key.
No matter how advanced the technology is, if it has no application, it's useless. I agree with this view.
It's interesting, but it still depends on whether the ecosystem can really come to life.
Low-cost transfers and payments are a necessity, and betting on this direction has a higher potential.
View OriginalReply0
SwapWhisperer
· 8h ago
Honestly, choose a mix of C and D, follow the trend and get on board first. Anyway, the current hype is so high that I'm afraid of missing the wave if I don't join in.
But your words really hit me. "Technologically invincible users are zero" is indeed the fate of many chains. Plasma must avoid this pitfall.
View OriginalReply0
NeverVoteOnDAO
· 8h ago
To be honest, infrastructure is just a display without applications.
Choose B, let's see who can create something truly usable first.
Wait, is there any data on transaction fees? It seems no one is discussing this.
View OriginalReply0
FlashLoanLarry
· 8h ago
Honestly, I'll choose B. Ecosystem capability is the key.
No matter how advanced the technology is, if no one uses it, it's useless. I've seen too many projects like this.
Really looking forward to a decent application coming out, instead of just talking on paper.
---
A hybrid of D+E... a friend recommended it, but I haven't fully understood it myself. Let's wait and see how they proceed.
---
The transaction fee part is the real focus. Cheap is the hard truth.
---
I feel like I've been hyped up a bit too much. Calm down and think about it, genuine user support is indeed necessary.
---
Basically, it's betting on ecosystem explosion. Otherwise, no matter how strong the infrastructure is, no one will pay for it.
The increasing frequency of Plasma being featured recently😂 I initially just clicked out of curiosity, but the more I looked, the more I found this project quite interesting. It's not the kind of hype-driven promotion that erupts suddenly; rather, it feels like someone is quietly working on building the entire ecosystem step by step.
But honestly, from an ordinary user’s perspective, what people really care about is quite practical—
Is it user-friendly? Are the transaction fees expensive? What can you do within the ecosystem? Are there real users using it?
These details are much more important than how "awesome the architecture design" is, at least to me personally.
I want to open up a discussion here (feel free to chat in the comments, just be reasonable)👇
Why are you paying attention to XPL? What kind of considerations are you based on?
A) You see Plasma’s technological direction and believe it can create long-term value
B) You are more optimistic about the ecosystem’s capabilities, betting on a wave of application outbreaks later
C) Purely driven by market sentiment and trading opportunities
D) Influenced by friends or discussions in the community, just hopping on the bandwagon
E) Still in the research phase, want to hear what experts think
And there’s a more core question:
What do you expect the "leading application" of the Plasma ecosystem to look like first? Will it be a low-cost transfer tool, a certain DEX platform, a lending protocol, or a chain game product? Or perhaps a payment app that’s close to everyday life for ordinary people?
My feeling is that no matter how strong the infrastructure is, it can’t withstand a situation of "technologically invincible but with zero users," so I hope to see Plasma successfully develop a path of "usable, easy to use, genuinely used by people," rather than just staying at the technical level.