The governance vote in the Injective community has just concluded, and the IIP-617 proposal was officially passed with an overwhelming support rate of 99.89%. This adjustment touches the core mechanism of the INJ token economy — not only optimizing the issuance rhythm of the native token but more importantly strengthening the buyback and burn model based on protocol revenue.



From the data, Injective has so far burned approximately 6.85 million INJ tokens, and the launch of this new mechanism means that the burn intensity will continue to increase in the future. Using revenue generated by the protocol itself to support the token’s value has become a standard option for many ecosystem projects. In a market where token inflation is generally sensitive, Injective’s move clearly responds to the community’s expectations with concrete actions — turning inflation pressure into burn support.

The implementation of such governance decisions often reflects the maturity of an ecosystem. The shift of INJ’s token economy from passive adjustments to proactive optimization is backed by increased community participation and a deeper understanding of token design in ecosystem development.
INJ-3,04%
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 5
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
HashBardvip
· 01-23 00:01
ngl the 99.89% vote feels almost *too* clean... like watching a perfectly composed sonnet about tokenomics. 6.85m inj burned tho, that's the narrative arc worth tracking. wonder if this deflation theater actually moves the price or if we're just watching the community convince itself that burning tokens = fundamentals lol
Reply0
wrekt_but_learningvip
· 01-21 04:42
99.89%? This data seems a bit too neat; could there be an issue with the voting mechanism... Burning 6.85 million tokens sounds like a lot, but can it withstand the selling pressure before the bull market arrives? Really? The INJ community engagement is so high? Why do I feel like it's still just the same group voting? Buyback and burn is a common tactic now; what's the differentiation? If you ask me, the key is whether they can really execute it properly later on. Good-looking data on paper doesn't mean much.
View OriginalReply0
MissedAirdropBrovip
· 01-20 00:35
99.89% support rate? How many people need to participate in the vote? It really feels like the INJ community has strong cohesion.
View OriginalReply0
AlwaysMissingTopsvip
· 01-20 00:28
Wow, 99.89%? This voting turnout is just too outrageous, is there really no one opposing? Everyone is now playing the destruction routine, let's see if INJ can hold on. 6.85 million tokens are gone... I just want to know if there will really be a lasting effect, or if it's just another round of harvesting the little guys.
View OriginalReply0
RamenStackervip
· 01-20 00:06
Burn 6.85 million tokens? This level of commitment is real, unlike some projects that just shout slogans.
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)