2026-01-20 08:26:19

The Ethereum network has recently been quite active, with on-chain activity reaching a record high. However, there is an interesting phenomenon behind this — security analysts have pointed out that some of the activity may be due to "address poisoning" type spam attacks.

The data is in front of us: since January, the number of new addresses and transaction volume on Ethereum have surged significantly. It looks prosperous, but there are hidden risks. The real turning point was the Dencun upgrade. After the upgrade, Ethereum's Gas fees dropped by over 60%, which sounds like a good thing, but also opened a door — low costs make large-scale spam attacks increasingly cost-effective.

Further research data shows that this type of poisoning attack has already accounted for a considerable proportion. In other words, not all network prosperity represents genuine ecological activity. On-chain activity is indeed increasing, but the quality varies. For those trying to assess the true health of the Ethereum ecosystem, this is a noteworthy signal.

ETH-2.51%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

13 Likes

Reward
13
9
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

SchrodingerWallet

· 18h ago

Haha, once again the cheap Gas attracts spam attacks When the data makes your eyes dizzy, it's actually all illusion. My wallet has been hacked again Dencun's attack is a bit covert If you think about it, my small addresses are indeed a bit suspicious hahaha Prosperity is all an illusion. Real health? Don't joke with me

View OriginalReply0

ConsensusDissenter

· 01-21 00:06

Haha, hilarious. Once again, data falsification. The high proportion of spam attacks is really outrageous. --- Gas prices have become cheaper, but it has actually attracted a bunch of spam, very ironic. --- The issue of poisoning has long been something to pay attention to, but no one cares. --- What is the real active user count? Can someone tell me... --- The Dencun upgrade didn't really open the door, it's not very good. --- Looking at the excitement, it's all just water; this ecosystem feels a bit虚. --- The uneven quality is just a joke; it's hard to tell who is a real user. --- Low-cost spam attacks are exploding; I should have thought of that earlier. --- The data looks good on the surface, but behind it is all poisoning. I just stop looking. --- That's why I never trust on-chain activity metrics.

View OriginalReply0

CrashHotline

· 01-20 10:25

Gas fees are so cheap that it has become a paradise for trash tokens, how ironic. Happy just because the numbers look good, but who really checks what those transactions are for? So now looking at on-chain data should come with a question mark; the actual activity might not be as high as imagined. The Dencun upgrade was originally a good thing, but it ended up being used as a trash dump. Don't just look at the number of new addresses; you need to see what these addresses are actually doing. This is why it's too risky to only look at surface data; you need to dig deeper. Happy when activity hits a new high? Let's see who is actually active.

View OriginalReply0

GoldDiggerDuck

· 01-20 08:56

It's the same story again. When Gas prices are low, it becomes a paradise for wash trading, and the data looks ridiculously good. Real activity is probably more than halved... It's interesting that they don't mention garbage transactions when bragging about prosperity. So how much of this activity is fake? Fifty-fifty? The Dencun upgrade is a good thing, but it’s definitely been exploited. The data looks impressive, but what exactly is inside? It feels like every time on-chain data surges, a note in parentheses is added... This is called "false prosperity," and we've seen it all before.

View OriginalReply0

MerkleDreamer

· 01-20 08:51

Gas prices have become cheaper, but it has actually attracted a bunch of spam users to flood the data, which is ridiculous... It seems that the activity is actually quite inflated.

View OriginalReply0

AirdropChaser

· 01-20 08:42

Haha, that's why I say you can't just look at the data, all these trash addresses are just trying to make a presence. Gas is cheaper, but it has become a paradise for attackers, quite ironic. The Dencun upgrade is a double-edged sword; costs have decreased but the ecosystem has also been polluted. Watching the excitement, but it's all just false prosperity, exhausting. The high proportion of poisoning attacks this time raises questions about true activity. On-chain activity is high, but the quality is disappointing, a bit embarrassing. Where are the real users? They are drowned out by these trash.

View OriginalReply0

AirdropCollector

· 01-20 08:40

Uh... So is this wave of activity actually just garbage? It's a bit embarrassing. --- Gas prices dropping actually invites trouble; upon reflection, it's indeed ironic. --- With such rampant poisoning, can we still trust the data? We need to learn to discern. --- Another case of "looks great but actually very risky," old tricks again. --- The Dencun upgrade was well-intentioned, but unexpectedly turned into a free attack tool. --- The uneven quality is real; this is exactly why I remain skeptical of on-chain data. --- It feels like now analyzing transaction data is like looking at edited images, all just tricks. --- This is the real problem—the most frightening thing is false prosperity.

View OriginalReply0

MoneyBurner

· 01-20 08:37

Damn, the drop in Gas fees actually makes me more anxious... This false prosperity built on these garbage addresses, why didn't anyone clarify this earlier?

View OriginalReply0

GasFeeNightmare

· 01-20 08:30

Here we go again, cheap gas has become a paradise for spam... I was wondering why there are so many strange addresses after the Dencun upgrade, and now there's data to confirm it. Is the poisoning ratio so high? Then how many of the transactions I monitor every night are fake?

View OriginalReply0