Recent statements highlight how tariff mechanisms can serve dual purposes beyond pure economics. The claim? Eight conflicts allegedly wrapped up partly through trade leverage and tariff pressure.

The argument centers on operational flexibility—current frameworks supposedly offer "unbelievable" room for maneuver when national security enters the equation. Alternative approaches? They might lack that same strategic punch.

For macro watchers, this signals how trade policy tools increasingly blur lines between diplomacy and economic warfare. Markets sensitive to geopolitical shifts should note: tariffs aren't just about revenue anymore—they're becoming chess pieces in a bigger game.