Recently, I encountered something quite puzzling—I’ve been consistently posting daily content for a certain liquidity project for over half a month now, sometimes even managing to squeeze out two articles in a day, yet my name hasn't shown up on the 7-day trending leaderboard at all.
The key point is, I started writing right at the beginning of the season, when barely anyone was involved with this project, and with updates every three days, there was basically no competition. Logically, I should have gained some traction by now, right? But instead, the more I post, the more it feels like I’m just entertaining myself.
Is this an issue with the platform’s algorithm, or am I really being treated as invisible by the system?
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
13 Likes
Reward
13
6
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
GateUser-2fce706c
· 4h ago
Bro, this is just missing the opportunity. I’ve said before that the most crucial thing for these kinds of projects is the early-stage layout before the season starts. Getting in now means you've already missed the golden window, no matter how good the mechanism is, it’s pointless.
View OriginalReply0
LiquidatedNotStirred
· 12-07 17:53
This system just won't be satisfied until we've worked ourselves to death, huh?
---
Missed the early dividends? No matter how hard you try now, it's all for nothing.
---
I think maybe you need to look at it from another angle. Is content quality really not the main issue?
---
Churning out two articles a day is real dedication, but timing really is everything.
---
Whether you're invisible or not, the algorithm is just like this. You need the right timing, location, and people.
---
Hold on, are you sure it's a system issue, or did you just not hit the right spot for people?
---
Persistence is good, but sometimes direction is worth more than effort.
View OriginalReply0
ContractSurrender
· 12-07 11:50
This mechanism is indeed problematic; the algorithm starves content creators.
View OriginalReply0
EthMaximalist
· 12-07 11:50
This popularity ranking is totally a black box. I've encountered it too.
View OriginalReply0
RugResistant
· 12-07 11:47
It's overwhelming—no matter how good the content is, it's useless without the algorithm.
View OriginalReply0
OnchainHolmes
· 12-07 11:39
Haha, that's the magical part of Web3—no matter how hard you work on your content, it all depends on the system's mood.
Recently, I encountered something quite puzzling—I’ve been consistently posting daily content for a certain liquidity project for over half a month now, sometimes even managing to squeeze out two articles in a day, yet my name hasn't shown up on the 7-day trending leaderboard at all.
The key point is, I started writing right at the beginning of the season, when barely anyone was involved with this project, and with updates every three days, there was basically no competition. Logically, I should have gained some traction by now, right? But instead, the more I post, the more it feels like I’m just entertaining myself.
Is this an issue with the platform’s algorithm, or am I really being treated as invisible by the system?