Just witnessed something interesting with a decentralized identity solution in action.
A governance application needed to verify user tier status. Instead of requesting full credential access, the system pulled exactly what was needed—just the governance tier component. Nothing more, nothing less.
This modular approach to identity verification shows how far we've come. Your credentials stay compartmentalized. Apps only see what they absolutely need to function. The rest remains private.
It's these small implementation details that reveal whether an identity protocol actually respects user sovereignty or just talks about it. Selective disclosure isn't a feature—it's the baseline standard we should expect from any serious Web3 identity infrastructure.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
19 Likes
Reward
19
6
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
Deconstructionist
· 2h ago
Selective disclosure sounds nice, but there are very few protocols that can actually achieve it... Most are still just playing with the concept.
View OriginalReply0
ChainProspector
· 12-07 10:56
Alright, finally a project that really understands privacy—not just paying lip service.
View OriginalReply0
TokenTherapist
· 12-07 10:44
Selective disclosure is indeed the best-selling story right now, but how many projects can actually achieve it?
View OriginalReply0
blocksnark
· 12-07 10:42
This selective disclosure thing... sounds great, but what about reality? Most projects are still just muddling through.
View OriginalReply0
MiningDisasterSurvivor
· 12-07 10:38
Hyping up the privacy concept again? I’ve been through this before—those projects back in 2018 hyped it up the same way. In the end, some ran off, and others got their contracts hacked. Selective disclosure sounds great, but can you really trust it? If the project team truly respected user sovereignty, they wouldn’t secretly change contract parameters before launch.
View OriginalReply0
SleepTrader
· 12-07 10:30
Selective disclosure should be standard practice; it's ridiculous that we still have to make a special point of it.
Just witnessed something interesting with a decentralized identity solution in action.
A governance application needed to verify user tier status. Instead of requesting full credential access, the system pulled exactly what was needed—just the governance tier component. Nothing more, nothing less.
This modular approach to identity verification shows how far we've come. Your credentials stay compartmentalized. Apps only see what they absolutely need to function. The rest remains private.
It's these small implementation details that reveal whether an identity protocol actually respects user sovereignty or just talks about it. Selective disclosure isn't a feature—it's the baseline standard we should expect from any serious Web3 identity infrastructure.