Anyone got the legit contract address for $builders? Drop it if you've verified it.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
13 Likes
Reward
13
7
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
AirdropHunterWang
· 9h ago
Does anyone have the contract address? Please don't give us a fake one and scam us.
View OriginalReply0
GasFeeTherapist
· 9h ago
Guys, is this for real? Can anyone verify the $builders contract address? Don't let it be another honeypot.
View OriginalReply0
BetterLuckyThanSmart
· 9h ago
Oh, this looks interesting. Can someone confirm the contract address? Don’t try to scam us with a fake one.
View OriginalReply0
ShibaMillionairen't
· 9h ago
Oh wow, this is really taking off. Does anyone have the official contract address... it has to be the verified one.
View OriginalReply0
MetaMisfit
· 9h ago
Damn, is this $builders really about to take off? Does anyone have the official contract address? Don’t give me any copy-pasted fake stuff.
View OriginalReply0
DefiPlaybook
· 9h ago
According to on-chain data, the contract risk certification rate for new projects like $builders is only 23%. It is recommended to use the following strategy: first, verify through Etherscan's official process, and second, cross-reference with the project's multi-chain deployment addresses. Here's a practical tip: don't rush in impulsively.
View OriginalReply0
ZKProofster
· 9h ago
ngl, everyone asking for the contract like it's some kind of treasure hunt. technically speaking, if you haven't verified the bytecode yourself, you're just trusting someone else's "verification" — which is... not really verification at all, is it?
This one's catching fire.
Anyone got the legit contract address for $builders? Drop it if you've verified it.