A certain partner at Sequoia recently discussed a pretty interesting topic—why is that rocket-building guy able to leave all his competitors in the dust?
The core view is quite disruptive: this person isn’t a lone hero at all, but more like a “collective intelligence entity.” The team’s operating model is a bit like the mysterious Bourbaki group in mathematics—one name on the surface, but behind it is a network of top minds collaborating.
The most brutal part is the selection process. Ordinary companies look at resumes, but they look for “cognitive level gaps.” Intelligence isn’t distributed linearly; the gulf between geniuses can be even greater than that between geniuses and ordinary people. When they bet on the space project back then, what stood out was this unconventional decision-making system—an unorthodox organizational structure paired with disruptive execution.
To put it simply, the winner isn’t a single person’s brilliance, but that the entire system is designed to be unconventional enough.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
5 Likes
Reward
5
5
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
ruggedNotShrugged
· 11h ago
Hmm... I do agree with the idea of cognitive hierarchy gaps, but I feel it still overestimates the role of organizational structure. Execution is what truly matters.
View OriginalReply0
SleepTrader
· 11h ago
System design is more powerful than individual genius, I agree with that. But in reality, aren't both indispensable?
View OriginalReply0
RealYieldWizard
· 12h ago
Ha, that's why some people can take off while others are still crawling on the ground. System design is the real key—personal heroism is just an illusion.
View OriginalReply0
MetaverseLandlady
· 12h ago
That's what I said—a person, no matter how awesome, still needs a top-tier team to back them up. Relying solely on individual heroism is long outdated.
View OriginalReply0
YieldFarmRefugee
· 12h ago
I do agree with the concept of collective intelligence, but to be honest, no matter how impressive the system is, someone still needs to be able to hold it down. You can't deny that, right?
A certain partner at Sequoia recently discussed a pretty interesting topic—why is that rocket-building guy able to leave all his competitors in the dust?
The core view is quite disruptive: this person isn’t a lone hero at all, but more like a “collective intelligence entity.” The team’s operating model is a bit like the mysterious Bourbaki group in mathematics—one name on the surface, but behind it is a network of top minds collaborating.
The most brutal part is the selection process. Ordinary companies look at resumes, but they look for “cognitive level gaps.” Intelligence isn’t distributed linearly; the gulf between geniuses can be even greater than that between geniuses and ordinary people. When they bet on the space project back then, what stood out was this unconventional decision-making system—an unorthodox organizational structure paired with disruptive execution.
To put it simply, the winner isn’t a single person’s brilliance, but that the entire system is designed to be unconventional enough.