This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
15 Likes
Reward
15
5
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
BankruptcyArtist
· 4h ago
Multi-chain deployment, that's really how it's done. Compared to going all-in on a single chain, this approach is much more comfortable.
View OriginalReply0
TommyTeacher1
· 16h ago
I have to say, this is the right way to play with chains. Stop hiding in one ecosystem and getting self-satisfied; multi-chain deployment is the real deal.
View OriginalReply0
RektRecorder
· 16h ago
Alright, the multi-chain strategy is nothing new, but how many can actually survive?
View OriginalReply0
TokenUnlocker
· 16h ago
Not getting locked into a single ecosystem—this approach is definitely clear-headed. Multi-chain deployment should be the standard, yet there are still people betting on single chains, haha.
View OriginalReply0
DEXRobinHood
· 16h ago
This multi-chain strategy is indeed ruthless. But what’s the story behind the number 2112?
Looking back at our project, the best call we made? Not boxing ourselves into one platform or ecosystem.
We pushed beyond the usual suspects - brought in Farcaster integration, built on Base. But here's the thing: we didn't stop at Base either.
Solana. Ethereum. Hyperliquid. Bitcoin. Even Monad.
All part of the strategy.
2112 pieces. Free to mint.
Sometimes the wins come from refusing to play it safe.