Looking at the latest valuation data, it's quite interesting.
The STAR 50 Index currently has a static PE ratio of 103x, and the forward PE is even more exaggerated—115x. What about the ChiNext Index? The static PE is also 103x, but the forward PE has dropped to 62x. In contrast, the CSI 300 Index has a static PE of 14x and a forward PE of 12x.
That's a stark contrast, right? The cheap stocks are left untouched, while the expensive ones are being chased. The market just loves to do these counterintuitive things.
Suppose we give the CSI 300 a bit of a premium and push its PE up to over 20x? Stock prices would double immediately. But in reality, capital favors high-valuation targets, while low-valuation sectors keep slumping.
Looking ahead, which is more likely to rise? Which is more likely to keep falling? The valuations have already given the answer—it's just a matter of whether the market is willing to acknowledge it.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
13 Likes
Reward
13
4
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
GasWaster
· 12-06 08:55
The 115x PE ratio of STAR 50 really can't hold up anymore, haha.
View OriginalReply0
0xSleepDeprived
· 12-06 08:47
The STAR 50 and CSI 300 are worlds apart; it's just ridiculous. The market insists on chasing high prices, while no one pays attention to the cheap ones. I really don't get it.
View OriginalReply0
governance_ghost
· 12-06 08:41
The PE ratio of STAR 50 is outrageous, those chasing the highs are really bold. ChiNext is so cheap and no one is interested. Honestly, this is just a game of musical chairs.
View OriginalReply0
UnluckyMiner
· 12-06 08:29
STAR 50 is really outrageous. There's still people chasing it at a 115x dynamic PE—how optimistic do you have to be?
Looking at the latest valuation data, it's quite interesting.
The STAR 50 Index currently has a static PE ratio of 103x, and the forward PE is even more exaggerated—115x. What about the ChiNext Index? The static PE is also 103x, but the forward PE has dropped to 62x. In contrast, the CSI 300 Index has a static PE of 14x and a forward PE of 12x.
That's a stark contrast, right? The cheap stocks are left untouched, while the expensive ones are being chased. The market just loves to do these counterintuitive things.
Suppose we give the CSI 300 a bit of a premium and push its PE up to over 20x? Stock prices would double immediately. But in reality, capital favors high-valuation targets, while low-valuation sectors keep slumping.
Looking ahead, which is more likely to rise? Which is more likely to keep falling? The valuations have already given the answer—it's just a matter of whether the market is willing to acknowledge it.