2025-12-06 08:22:50

The results of the supporter whitelist have been confirmed.

8,707 wallets and 1,648 X accounts have been selected. Those who made it onto the list can now indicate their intention to participate and can also choose the network and investment amount themselves. The minimum and maximum allocation amounts will also be adjusted.

There hadn't been any news about the sale for a while, and even the comment section was closed, so I was wondering what was going on. Turns out, an update was posted early in the morning. The timing was a bit awkward.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

10 Likes

Reward
10
4
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

GateUser-cff9c776

· 12-06 08:48

Announcing it in the middle of the night—are they testing our information literacy? According to information economics, this is a classic example of asymmetric information advantage [dog head] Wait, 8,707 wallets? No matter how you look at it, this number feels like some kind of random lottery under a DAO governance mechanism—a perfect illustration of "Schrödinger's whitelist." This move is honestly a bit awkward: quietly launching sales in the middle of the night, turning off the comments section, as if they're afraid someone will ask "Is this a rug?" From a supply and demand perspective, limited quantity equals artistry. Anyway, I'm already preparing to adjust my investment amount. The all-in warriors are about to start calculating ROI again. To be honest, with such a sneaky timing, if it weren't for trusting the project team, I'd almost think this was some “creative expression” of the Web3 decentralized spirit.

View OriginalReply0

LiquidityWitch

· 12-06 08:47

Released in the middle of the night? That move is a bit puzzling, but the brothers who made it onto the list can finally take action.

View OriginalReply0

RugDocDetective