Here's something most folks overlook: what actually hits the grid matters way more than flashy capacity numbers.



Renewable projects? They're trapped in a brutal cycle. Can't achieve consistent firm generation. That upfront capital expenditure creates an NPV pit they simply never climb out of. The math doesn't lie—when your generation profile stays inconsistent, recovering those initial costs becomes nearly impossible.

This isn't rocket science. It's fundamental energy economics. Yet people keep missing it because they'd rather not dig into the uncomfortable details.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 5
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
ThesisInvestorvip
· 8h ago
ngl, scalability is what really matters. Those who hype up capacity are just misleading people... The payback period for eco projects is honestly insane.
View OriginalReply0
CompoundPersonalityvip
· 12-06 07:42
Damn, that's so true. The renewable energy narrative is just an NPV black hole.
View OriginalReply0
SatsStackingvip
· 12-06 07:38
NGL, I've seen through that renewable numbers game long ago—it's just that the costs will never be recouped.
View OriginalReply0
tokenomics_truthervip
· 12-06 07:33
Nah, this is exactly why wind and solar power have always been overhyped. Anyone who truly understands energy economics knows there's a catch here.
View OriginalReply0
PebbleHandervip
· 12-06 07:31
ngl this is the real truth, everyone’s been fooled by the capacity numbers—stability is what really matters.
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)