Think about it—actually cycling capital back into the Solana ecosystem instead of just draining liquidity like pump-and-dump schemes do? That's how you build sustainable value. When protocols reinvest rather than extract, everyone wins. The difference between building and bleeding is where you put the profits.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
7 Likes
Reward
7
5
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
BuyTheTop
· 23h ago
Well said, someone finally hit the sore spot. Those rugs are just sucking blood while running away, while projects that genuinely want to build something will reinvest their profits.
View OriginalReply0
MoonBoi42
· 12-06 03:55
ngl this is the right path, way better than those projects that just fleece users.
View OriginalReply0
GhostAddressHunter
· 12-06 03:50
ngl this is the right way, don’t just think about cashing out quickly; only when the ecosystem is healthy can you sustain profits...
View OriginalReply0
AltcoinMarathoner
· 12-06 03:44
just like mile 20 in a marathon, this capital recycling thing separates the real builders from the exit-liquidity chasers. been stacking sol ecosystem plays since the fundys still looked grim... these reinvestment cycles are exactly what adoption curves need to keep climbing tbh
Reply0
FUD_Vaccinated
· 12-06 03:40
Well said, this is the right path. Compared to those projects that just fleece users, only those that cycle profits back into the ecosystem are truly thinking long-term.
Think about it—actually cycling capital back into the Solana ecosystem instead of just draining liquidity like pump-and-dump schemes do? That's how you build sustainable value. When protocols reinvest rather than extract, everyone wins. The difference between building and bleeding is where you put the profits.