I noticed an interesting phenomenon in the past couple of days: Seven government agencies in China have just jointly issued a risk warning about virtual currencies, while across the ocean, the US is also restricting its citizens from participating in crypto trading, with many platforms simply blacklisting IPs from certain regions.
On the surface, both seem to be “tightening” regulations, but if you look deeper, their approaches are completely different.
China’s logic is pretty straightforward—the decentralized nature of virtual currencies is fundamentally at odds with the existing financial regulatory framework. This isn’t a technical issue; it’s a matter of system compatibility. In the US, on the other hand, it feels more like “they haven’t figured out what to do yet”: How should taxes be collected? Which department is responsible? Is it a security or a commodity? These fundamental questions are still being debated. Once they sort things out internally, their attitude might change.
So don’t just jump in because things look exciting. Policy risk is no joke.
The market will always be there, but if your money’s gone, it’s truly gone. Instead of getting envious of others making fast money, it’s better to first understand the rules of the game. After all, in the world of cryptocurrency, surviving longer is more important than running faster.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
9 Likes
Reward
9
5
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
APY_Chaser
· 23h ago
Ha, the US is still wrangling, but we've already tabled it directly here. The difference is huge.
Wait, the topic says surviving longer is more important than running faster? But I see a bunch of people are still betting that the US will loosen up later...
The domestic framework itself is inherently at odds with decentralization, that's a fatal flaw, and it can't be fixed in the short term.
Is the US really just sorting out tax issues over there, or are they also fundamentally afraid?
You're right, once the money's gone, it's really gone. But can you really be content not participating?
Staying calm is right, but it really sucks to feel like the opportunity is slipping away right in front of you.
The framework issue can't be solved; that's not a gap time alone can fill.
Even if the US really wants to open up, it'll probably take years, and things here might always stay the same.
View OriginalReply0
rekt_but_not_broke
· 12-05 14:51
Ha, this time the issue domestically is indeed structural conflict, while in the US they just haven’t woken up yet. Once they figure things out, it’ll probably be a whole new game.
Longevity is truly key—I used to be the one running ahead too fast, only now do I get it.
Don’t chase the hype this round, seriously. Policies can reset everything in an instant.
Domestically, they just say it’s incompatible. In the US, they’re still drafting bills. Either way, the result is the same—the ones who follow the rules survive the longest.
More restrictions again, platforms are blacklisting IPs one after another. Life just keeps getting more stressful.
Why insist on following the crowd? Isn’t earning steadily good enough? Why must you make that one big bet?
With these new restrictions, it feels like a lot of people haven’t realized how serious things are yet.
That’s why I say, don’t just get jealous of those making fast money; keeping a clear head is what matters most.
View OriginalReply0
BlockchainTherapist
· 12-05 14:46
In China, it's really a one-size-fits-all approach, while the US is still struggling with how to regulate. The difference is huge.
---
You're right. Those chasing quick money always die fast; longevity is the key.
---
Wait, even if the US figures it out, will they really open things up? Feels like they'll still find a way to fleece retail investors.
---
Many people jumped all in without fully understanding the policy risks—it's a real shame.
---
You made a good point about system compatibility conflicts—that's the real crux of the issue.
---
Anyway, if the rules are unclear now, it's best to stay calm and wait. You won't really miss out on anything major.
---
It's pretty normal that there's still a lot of arguing in the US; historically, it's always chaos first, then regulation.
View OriginalReply0
MetaverseLandlady
· 12-05 14:46
Haha, the US is still struggling with how to regulate it, while over here we've directly blocked it using the "system conflict theory." The mindset is totally different.
That's why I've always said not to chase the hottest trends—policy changes are even more thrilling than price fluctuations.
Look at those who rushed in impatiently; they'll be crying when their IP gets blacklisted.
Surviving is more important than making quick money. Remembering this sentence can save you a lot of tuition fees.
The US will probably keep debating for a few more years; no one can predict the policy direction by then.
View OriginalReply0
SandwichHunter
· 12-05 14:43
Ha, in China we're laying our cards on the table, while the US is still all talk and no action—the difference is huge.
To be honest, they're in chaos over taxes, while we have framework issues over here... Surviving is what really matters.
I noticed an interesting phenomenon in the past couple of days: Seven government agencies in China have just jointly issued a risk warning about virtual currencies, while across the ocean, the US is also restricting its citizens from participating in crypto trading, with many platforms simply blacklisting IPs from certain regions.
On the surface, both seem to be “tightening” regulations, but if you look deeper, their approaches are completely different.
China’s logic is pretty straightforward—the decentralized nature of virtual currencies is fundamentally at odds with the existing financial regulatory framework. This isn’t a technical issue; it’s a matter of system compatibility. In the US, on the other hand, it feels more like “they haven’t figured out what to do yet”: How should taxes be collected? Which department is responsible? Is it a security or a commodity? These fundamental questions are still being debated. Once they sort things out internally, their attitude might change.
So don’t just jump in because things look exciting. Policy risk is no joke.
The market will always be there, but if your money’s gone, it’s truly gone. Instead of getting envious of others making fast money, it’s better to first understand the rules of the game. After all, in the world of cryptocurrency, surviving longer is more important than running faster.