Recently, I took a look at the index products available in the market and found something quite interesting. On the regulatory side, they’ve highlighted a few key index directions, including the CSI 300, CSI Dividend Low Volatility 100, and the STAR Market, but in reality—a lot of fund companies haven’t actually followed up on the Dividend Low Volatility 100 product.



What’s even more frustrating is the fee rate. I specifically compared a bunch, and among the existing similar products, the C class shares generally start at a 0.5% management fee, plus another 0.4% sales service fee. That cost really isn’t low.

There’s another point that can be confusing and needs clarification: The Dividend Low Volatility Index and the Dividend Low Volatility 100 Index may only differ by “100” in their names, but there are significant differences in their underlying constituent stocks. The latter generally selects targets with much smaller market caps, and their actual performance could be entirely different. When allocating, don’t just assume they’re the same type of product because the names look alike; you need to take a close look at the portfolio structure.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 4
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
NFTragedyvip
· 12-05 23:25
The fees are really outrageous, starting at 0.9%. Plus, you can only buy if you hold a certain amount—it's such a rip-off.
View OriginalReply0
unrekt.ethvip
· 12-05 10:53
The regulators just make statements and that's it; very few fund companies actually follow through—it's just too realistic. They're really stingy with the fees, 0.5% + 0.4%, just giving money away for nothing? Just missing a "100" in the name and the holdings are completely different? Unbelievable, you really have to watch out for these traps.
View OriginalReply0
GasFeeBarbecuevip
· 12-05 10:49
The fees are really outrageous; a 0.9% cost eats up so much of the returns. --- Dividend Low Volatility 100 has really been neglected, and fund companies can't even be bothered to follow up. --- Just a difference of "100" in the name makes such a big difference? Isn't that just ripping people off? --- Speaking of these fees, they're exactly like the A-share funds back home. --- Here we go again, regulators talk a good game but fund companies just couldn't care less. --- How can they dare to use almost the same name when the holdings structure is so different? Ridiculous. --- Starting with a 0.5% management fee is basically daylight robbery, even more expensive than the gas fees of some shitcoins. --- Why is there such a big difference between Dividend Low Volatility 100 and Dividend Low Volatility? Who designed these categories?
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)