Golden Finance reported that this week Bitcoin Core developers erroneously claimed that nearly 40% of Knots Nodes, Core's biggest competitor, were being counted multiple times, creating a false impression of their actual scale.
They cited technical criticisms regarding the number of reachable Nodes in Knots, accusing that (before many posts were deleted) as much as 39% of the Nodes (1,758 out of 4,468) were double-counted due to the so-called “Sybil attack”, thereby “artificially inflating the number of Knots users”.
As background, the two most popular versions of Bitcoin node software are currently: Bitcoin Core (which accounts for approximately 80-88% of the market share) and Knots (which accounts for approximately 12-19% of the market share). The specific percentages depend on the estimation method.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
Bitcoin core developers claim that Knots node operators exaggerate the statistics.
Golden Finance reported that this week Bitcoin Core developers erroneously claimed that nearly 40% of Knots Nodes, Core's biggest competitor, were being counted multiple times, creating a false impression of their actual scale. They cited technical criticisms regarding the number of reachable Nodes in Knots, accusing that (before many posts were deleted) as much as 39% of the Nodes (1,758 out of 4,468) were double-counted due to the so-called “Sybil attack”, thereby “artificially inflating the number of Knots users”. As background, the two most popular versions of Bitcoin node software are currently: Bitcoin Core (which accounts for approximately 80-88% of the market share) and Knots (which accounts for approximately 12-19% of the market share). The specific percentages depend on the estimation method.