09:10 Observing TRUMPUSDT: Current price 3.605, 24h -2.80%. Sentiment is tilted cold (Fear&Greed 26). In such an environment, "rebounds that don't extend/breaks followed by pullbacks" oscillations are more likely to occur, so I prefer to establish a clear framework first, react to price levels, rather than guess direction based on emotion.

I'm only watching two key levels: A Confirmation Level 3.76900000, B Breakdown Level 3.59200000. When price is below A, I treat it as a retrace segment, prioritizing observation of volume and pullback speed; only if it effectively breaks above A and holds steady can it "graduate" from "watching" to "considering following." Conversely, if it breaks below B again and remains beneath it, the short-term should acknowledge weakness—better to do less than to force it.

On a side note, there's been a lot of recent news about geopolitical conflicts and regulatory tone, but I only treat it as background noise, not as verified fact, and certainly not as trading signals; these narrative coins are more susceptible to being driven by news cycles, the more heated it gets the more I need to restrain position size and frequency. This is not a confirmation signal, just an observation framework.

For reference only, not investment advice.

Would you prefer to see it stabilize above B first before discussing a rebound, or directly volume up and break through A before considering entry?