👀 家人們,每天看行情、刷大佬觀點,卻從來不開口說兩句?你的觀點可能比你想的更有價值!
廣場新人 & 回歸福利正式上線!不管你是第一次發帖還是久違回歸,我們都直接送你獎勵!🎁
每月 $20,000 獎金等你來領!
📅 活動時間: 長期有效(月底結算)
💎 參與方式:
用戶需爲首次發帖的新用戶或一個月未發帖的回歸用戶。
發帖時必須帶上話題標籤: #我在广场发首帖 。
內容不限:幣圈新聞、行情分析、曬單吐槽、幣種推薦皆可。
💰 獎勵機制:
必得獎:發帖體驗券
每位有效發帖用戶都可獲得 $50 倉位體驗券。(注:每月獎池上限 $20,000,先到先得!如果大家太熱情,我們會繼續加碼!)
進階獎:發帖雙王爭霸
月度發帖王: 當月發帖數量最多的用戶,額外獎勵 50U。
月度互動王: 當月帖子互動量(點讚+評論+轉發+分享)最高的用戶,額外獎勵 50U。
📝 發帖要求:
帖子字數需 大於30字,拒絕純表情或無意義字符。
內容需積極健康,符合社區規範,嚴禁廣告引流及違規內容。
💡 你的觀點可能會啓發無數人,你的第一次分享也許就是成爲“廣場大V”的起點,現在就開始廣場創作之旅吧!
Court Trial Dates Set for SEC_s Case Against Ripple Labs in Southern District of New York
In December 2020, the SEC filed a lawsuit against Ripple and its two utives, CEO Brad Garlinghouse and co-founder Chris Larsen, for an unregistered $1.3 billion securities offering by selling XRP, a token created by Ripple’s founders in 2012. This move led several exchanges to remove XRP from their listings to prevent legal issues.
However, in this case, on July 13th, Judge Torres ruled that XRP sales on public crypto exchanges weren’t securities offerings because buyers didn’t expect profits tied to Ripple’s efforts.
Torres cited a Supreme Court case that classifies investments in profits from others’ efforts in a shared enterprise as securities
Ripple’s XRP sales, including those by utives and for employee compensation, were determined not to be securities when conducted through programmatic sales on digital asset exchanges
Although the court ruling isn’t a conclusive verdict in the SEC v. Ripple case, Garlinghouse, Larsen, and the blockchain firm could still face liability for other breaches; many companies have relisted XRP or shown intentions to do so.
SEC to Appeal Judge’s Decision on Ripple’s XRP Sales Ruling
The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has announced its intention to pursue an “interlocutory appeal” in response to the recent legal decision regarding Ripple’s XRP sales
The decision by Judge Torres, which deemed XRP sales on public crypto exchanges not to be securities offerings, has ed the SEC to seek further action. The expression of disappointment by SEC Chair Gary Gensler over the ruling last month further underscores the regulator’s intent to challenge the decision.
The SEC aims to appeal specific aspects of the ruling while allowing other parts of the case to proceed to trial
The interlocutory appeal seeks an appellate court’s review of decisions made during the ongoing SEC vs. Ripple case to potentially prevent the need for separate trials for both the SEC and the government.
“The SEC seeks to certify the Court’s holding that Defendants’ ‘Programmatic’ offers and sales to XRP buyers over crypto asset trading platforms and Ripple’s ‘Other Distributions’ in exchange for labor and services did not involve the offer or sale of securities,” the SEC said in a court filing. “Interlocutory review is warranted here.”
Furthermore, the SEC highlighted divisions within the Southern District of New York to justify the need for the interlocutory appeal