A well-known investment institution's Chief Investment Officer recently pointed out a noteworthy issue: in an environment where Bitcoin prices are continuously rising, the stock performance of certain listed companies may experience stagflation. What are the consequences of this mismatch? The most direct impact is that the company will find it difficult to continue financing through ATM (automatic issuance mechanism). In more extreme cases, the company might be forced to reduce its Bitcoin reserves to buy back its own shares. This logic actually reflects a subtle contradiction between traditional finance and crypto asset allocation—when the held assets appreciate but the stock price stagnates, the company's financial flexibility is severely constrained. For listed companies holding large amounts of BTC, this is indeed a risk point worth considering.

BTC0.21%
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 10
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
GateUser-cff9c776vip
· 01-08 01:25
Ha, this is Schrödinger's bull market. BTC rises to the sky, but stock prices remain the same, a perfect interpretation of modern art.
View OriginalReply0
ForkLibertarianvip
· 01-07 17:37
That's why you can't go all-in on Bitcoin. When the stock price can't go up, you have to sell coins to save the situation. It's so frustrating.
View OriginalReply0
TokenCreatorOPvip
· 01-07 10:39
Ha, this is what you call the dilemma of asset allocation... BTC's soaring stock price is still at the floor --- No, wait, reducing BTC holdings to buy back stocks? Isn't that putting the cart before the horse? --- Wait, why do listed companies have to choose between these two? Can't they be greedy? --- Basically, it's an imbalance in allocation being exposed. It's too risky to have all the money in one basket. --- Forget it, let's stick to companies we believe in for the long term. Chasing these is too exhausting. --- Honestly, this has been an old problem—the fate of large coin holders. --- So that's why many institutions are now afraid to go all-in on BTC. --- It seems this risk doesn't have much impact on small retail investors; we don't have these worries at all. --- Here comes another scam to sell coins? I don't buy it. --- Financial flexibility is restricted? Then you should buy BTC on the dip even more.
View OriginalReply0
FreeMintervip
· 01-07 00:07
That's why you can't all-in on a single asset; diversification is the key.
View OriginalReply0
GasFeeCrybabyvip
· 01-05 04:55
Haha, this is awkward. BTC is soaring to the sky while stock prices are still crawling underground... These listed companies holding coins are really panicking.
View OriginalReply0
EternalMinervip
· 01-05 04:53
Ha, to put it simply, BTC is going crazy while stock prices are still weak, it's so embarrassing. Selling Bitcoin to rescue stock prices? Isn't that like shooting yourself in the foot? Truly brilliant...
View OriginalReply0
MetadataExplorervip
· 01-05 04:49
Well, this is awkward... BTC skyrocketed to the sky, but the stock price is still crawling on the ground. The company has to be forced to sell coins to buy back shares. Isn't this digging its own grave?
View OriginalReply0
BlockchainNewbievip
· 01-05 04:49
Haha, really, the awkward situation where BTC rises and stock prices fall does make people feel conflicted. --- Reducing BTC holdings to buy back stocks? Isn't that just drinking poison to quench thirst? It's better to think about how to improve the fundamentals. --- In simple terms, it's a matter of choosing between the fish and the bear's paw. Asset appreciation ≠ financial freedom. This logic is quite painful. --- So now, companies holding cryptocurrencies have to take a gamble, betting that their stock prices can catch up. Otherwise, they are truly passive. --- This analysis is quite good; it hits the pain points of traditional listed companies. However, the high threshold for ATM financing has been known for a long time. --- The worst-case scenario is being forced to cut losses. It seems some companies might really take this step. --- Wait, isn't this logic indicating that holding strategies actually carry risks? It seems this layer wasn't considered. --- A typical chicken rib dilemma. No wonder some institutions now have a somewhat fickle attitude.
View OriginalReply0
GhostAddressMinervip
· 01-05 04:33
Wait a moment, I see through the on-chain footprints here... The fund migration trajectories of these coin-holding companies have long been exposed. Once the stock price stalls, the dormant wallets should wake up.
View OriginalReply0
OnchainSnipervip
· 01-05 04:31
Selling BTC to save the stock price? That logic is really brilliant, shooting yourself in the foot.
View OriginalReply0
View More
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
English
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)