Salesforce dropped a bombshell take on AI: they're treating large language models like interchangeable parts. "These LLMs? All the same," their exec basically said. "Give us the cheapest option and we'll slot it in." That's the ultimate commodity play—when enterprise giants stop caring about brand names and just hunt for the lowest price tag.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
8 Likes
Reward
8
3
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
BrokenRugs
· 12-06 00:07
Salesforce's move this time is really something—they're basically selling LLMs like cabbages at a market... To put it nicely, it's called business rationality; to put it bluntly, it's just whoever is cheaper gets used, with no real care for model quality.
View OriginalReply0
BuyTheTop
· 12-05 23:53
LOL, Salesforce really dares to say that all LLMs are the same? Then how do you explain the price difference between GPT-4 and open-source models... Feels like this is just a typical client bargaining tactic.
View OriginalReply0
AirdropHunterKing
· 12-05 23:45
Oh wow, Salesforce is really bold to say that—are all LLMs the same? Then how come I didn’t notice any similarity when using GPT and Claude for free... Great, now big corporations are starting to squeeze value out of AI, and us small retail users are getting pushed into a corner again. All that gas fee spent was for nothing.
Salesforce dropped a bombshell take on AI: they're treating large language models like interchangeable parts. "These LLMs? All the same," their exec basically said. "Give us the cheapest option and we'll slot it in." That's the ultimate commodity play—when enterprise giants stop caring about brand names and just hunt for the lowest price tag.